IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 26 March 2015 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A791ACE83 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KfO4u2wLZVU9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [198.180.150.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9634E1ACECC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1Yb8mw-0005Vn-Ia; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:29:38 +0000
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:29:38 -0500
Message-ID: <m2egob4yst.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
In-Reply-To: <651803AE-97A4-4297-A079-B94A6BD1F104@nominum.com>
References: <5513FE6B.7090405@dcrocker.net> <651803AE-97A4-4297-A079-B94A6BD1F104@nominum.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-UPqdmhhn0-UQyf-2LoFOZll0Fg>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:31:02 -0000

>> So I suggest that providing explicit feedback to all appointees not up
>> for renewal become a regular part of nomcom's deliverables.
> I think this would be a fine plan.

great idea.  nomcom needs stuff to fill its copious spare time.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email