Re: leader statements

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Wed, 09 October 2013 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DEB21E81C0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Drn40oc3Z8Dg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09C321E81BA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id bj1so1610889pad.35 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=He5UY64pvrhKHS9Exs/Nbdt4Gow7PviZUWmt9iODUl0=; b=BjzdrMc0oAPzZyfe+whlyRK/RLkpdTEfI/r7Rz8xSyOZ7Wjmcadd0Phe8qhJ7+RtAK 57eH+ZfVtHOCV2ijK1yc2fGSeEQEphP9I/qV81pzPc1C6l/ftLpojQRWZ2NF07NDWEF0 VQZRJT1pysX888aKvEExz0FJ8z1QSfrbmfPcCGh42PX8aSj/rG+olOcCi/B9MdDb3Tfv GqAwxv5EuG2LiHCRGVVMOCoR/cv3+Ge3L3/8kTkSSAPpi0OUJT4hV/6H9sWcV6vpHufc X0V98WyV8/oqhNyhmbvWwwPZIxCTRzWMDDeeVnpJh2bOK+ByvL1aoCpqWgX9NPZTeNsE P6gA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.254.132 with SMTP id ai4mr9902634pbd.51.1381350394677; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.69.8.5 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5255B647.4090103@gmail.com>
References: <ABCF1EB7-3437-4EC3-B0A8-0EDB2EDEA538@ietf.org> <20131007225129.GA572@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20131008213432.0c1e4b30@resistor.net> <20131009064438.GA47673@mx1.yitter.info> <E003D3DC4E4B3208CF14E8E0@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20131009192715.GG49231@mx1.yitter.info> <5255B647.4090103@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 21:26:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ89i84gxt+1Tm6a36qS5Qrt=4y3gTxoN1Xz4hkdqScAP1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: leader statements
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e0a1195d23204e854b3ae"
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 20:26:37 -0000

There should be known limits for chairs, leaders, only if the procedures
have mentioned no limits of representation. Trust is there but still there
is also levels and limits for trust and representation.

AB

On Wednesday, October 9, 2013, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> On 10/10/2013 08:27, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> ...
> > What I am not sure about is whether people are willing to accept the
> > chairs acting in that sort of "leader of organization" role.  If we do
> > accept it, then I think as a consequence some communications will
> > happen without consultation.  For a CEO is not going to agree to issue
> > a joint communiqué with someone who has to go negotiate the contents
> > of that communiqué (and negotiate those contents in public).  If we do
> > not accept it, then we must face the fact that there will be meetings
> > where the IETF or IAB just isn't in the room, because we'll have
> > instructed the chairs not to act in that capacity.
>
> I've been there in the past, as IAB Chair, ISOC Board Chairman, and IETF
> Chair.
>
> Either we trust our current and future chairs, on certain occasions,
> to speak in our name without there being a discursive debate in advance,
> or we will have no voice on those occasions.
>
> If there was a pattern of I* chairs subscribing to statements that the
> relevant community clearly found quite outrageous, there might be an
> argument for having no voice.
>
> I suggest that there is no such pattern. There may be quibbles over
> wording sometimes, but that is inevitable when several different
> stakeholder organisations have to agree on wording. The wording is
> inevitably a compromise; it can't be otherwise.
>
> It's perfectly reasonable to ask our chairs to invite debate in
> advance when that is possible; but in many of these cases, it
> simply isn't. It's also perfectly reasonable that people should comment
> on the wording even after it's set in stone; that helps us to do better
> next time.
>
> If we nominate good candidates for our leadership positions, and send
> thoughtful comments to the NomCom (and the IESG and IAB for their
> nominating duties), we won't get leaders who put their names to
> anything outrageous.
>
> We should trust our chairs to act as figureheads and leaders towards
> the outside world.
>
>    Brian Carpenter
>
>