Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation

Keith Moore <> Sat, 15 February 2020 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921661200F4 for <>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:20:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7jN2Te23uE7 for <>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:20:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAE591200D7 for <>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:20:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal []) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A664A1; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 16:20:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 15 Feb 2020 16:20:21 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=fqLm6GaBF6z1QDCOc2xK/YUCODlRQozlaptw1vahj ZU=; b=yhVJLy502fvDl6PsbjfEZXiYE/1hm9wybzomqRwxMoyowYlY0fvhig1jF t/kJrNnrvkveRFKw1jabaU8br1vo5tImmeOXC5dl3GPnaVEC5Sa3vNz9zNm4sNhm 10kSb7nSw2XD+CIFYA5tv/US+kHDe/LBqY06fwN7iX3mx9f0wyEmEfE/91IkXvlM 4LDq8Ra6tbfwAky8pQaMK+Ob+alxs42NyITn9dXIAWb4ogX4gpFDcY6kPlgMzazx rwMilXObnhNFMGuUIs/HjS1rLo/qEjb6Q2C6ovCAngOMeg3197DZWXIRgf3dN4mG ULIljLAWzfqNZ6OkNYVTsAENqdxzg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:lGBIXmfUvs-pACKTEBVP4-ooV56WGcDVDTw9t4dAYfGd-YWzpOngrQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrjedvgdduhedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepuddtkedrvddvuddrudektddrud ehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhho ohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:lGBIXhdu3rM6Soyxi5o0-sVXDjXxe_v3zB3YyLuTY_w5x_JIQIx5Tw> <xmx:lGBIXknn43Yinsndz58EYEWi89QIq9TAeX51QjyjAo9BhPDkp52jEg> <xmx:lGBIXm8SRblpNHG2D7rNMg83S_CwLYGY0Ft78S0eMpFWRtXbxx_vuA> <xmx:lGBIXlXm1EAS6ruNBbglhJwP-EVTqxGLAE9yh0V5P1Fv4GCxisg2Gg>
Received: from [] ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2EFB03280059; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 16:20:20 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
References: <> <> <5CBB6602066BF4A674D4D092@PSB> <>
From: Keith Moore <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 16:20:16 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 21:20:26 -0000

On 2/15/20 2:41 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote:

> I think each draft should have a youtube video attached such that 
> instead of wasting time to listen to one actor shows watch it before 
> and then sped those 10-15 min to interactively discuss.

Videos are nearly always a huge waste of time, just as presentations in 
meetings are nearly always a huge waste of time.   If the internet-draft 
is too dense to be read in a few minutes, post the slides in advance 
(maybe with notes), expect people to read those, and spend the 
"presentation" time on questions-and-answers.

Face-to-face meeting time should be devoted to *interaction*.