IETF Logo Mail Archive

Topic IPv6

Alexander Nevalennyy <avnevalenniy@gmail.com> Mon, 21 November 2016 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <avnevalenniy@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF26129501 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:49:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lqevPxqdwy-f for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6179D129658 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id n21so350462892qka.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:49:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6LZw4KzA+aj4u5cI4cJMdOEpSuoAa8HkFRXTcDRVbqI=; b=Pr3Q8THe/0u2/wdN2I/RW8JARqPXwhEHfDr2sx0mxMiqyWIQ3KTMIv9iUECeTZlKxm DV9y4sZWCPnzMLx5yzm01KcKft9/YDMLbMmiAZtfaA1dr8jT63mNoCLsbnAJJUG3H7F9 1loInYweJNtmPAm2uhf6OPNPbFHoSUh5RKPmdqOcekTOLTJ465Q0HCloDPHkyX36i74V xqE427OA6c/nppA+A8mmF7EV9BtpPcPTzUn+KxtIDAhbKrTrzGOi2EKB0sOHOEeYM6M+ rluG7Ol06qa4Mvt/yXsgvN9bC2ugxsWBB9aUUhfBqcAQLANixjp3pnMAdZ4eFZVf6sJ7 oqRQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6LZw4KzA+aj4u5cI4cJMdOEpSuoAa8HkFRXTcDRVbqI=; b=PhVPKd3CR06Lff6MXDEexndD/5oPuaiyDuo+PxPgrl+Byx78c7fcJ47fk2eFUogkoh i49URjmNXboG8YhYoE9EXkyqo3WVFBPwfJQn01lRkucq3N5LwNTgj5o/c9QslHxjzMqV zhvp2KBh6yv/PbqoPqqrnKuPIe77oXLAX/Q5zuIHyKfZwyNgt20yJIM2BTd0Tf6nNMtm 1Z8OMDiOt4df77CAtaSnKKuzP7xC9O1LYktuKk9zOKTO+E7fstOW32RbOIZo9KWV98lI riOgUZJPY0eiBELdLzZAJCdvgNYKe12cGKFLVLwCaU15WXiatELBLDoVbvfQr1dhzXPI IE7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00bdc/U4VfST9SPkf7CIjTRtgcvteuQGE7c71QAo63UUU+EPMuTkgx3ZxPyZ8EDoy29hfEQntj6C4MQ3Q==
X-Received: by 10.55.18.30 with SMTP id c30mr17580246qkh.213.1479736143178; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:49:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.170.20 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:49:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Alexander Nevalennyy <avnevalenniy@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:49:02 +0300
Message-ID: <CAGxDXJ9L-Zfu+Wn8MogOn_yKgDKKuUVyqNp5mxNYaJZd-371qA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Topic IPv6
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114757f82d11640541cfeb1e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-YtuYktnbjCr5ZwJIVVLfHXpeFw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:49:06 -0000

Thank you for your opinion and fast support, Jordi.

About your points:

1. I am not sure that about privacy. Nobody need your IP while you do not
do something wrong. For instance, a lot of individuals call  via cell
phones without anonymous technologies.
2. Address can be provided for user or company like it is done in cell
phones. You have number for every device and nothing change when you will
go abroad and use roaming service. But it is only my opinion.
3. I meant usage of SLAAC for all ip-addresses (now it is optional).
4. Agree, but I had to provide all information.

Link is below:
http://www.slideshare.net/phdays/ipv6-35204784


Should I try to write to WG called ipsecme?


Regards, Alexander.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email