IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page>

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 21 June 2012 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B3011E809A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vwYy7Of63Tuk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F61111E808E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5LMKorQ007725; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1340317255; i=@resistor.net; bh=ppDPE17DPE+uXkWQZk22vUBZwwr4RftSKvBwFDN3Sys=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=v+mKe/lGYnViB6M9aqI2zGO6KBaj4UHB/D7Swf/Q5CTQH5w0urFeplGrcy4vlYt6v XjZYKXdhoAXD0X5KLZALwKnUe7gKOEBET8Ux6mGNFYO1uOW3gZhmYIlwu9VXCQUG5X Qq+T3d8IkdyGXPIXCdWAyX/+apEmscVbhsi3zY6w=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1340317255; i=@resistor.net; bh=ppDPE17DPE+uXkWQZk22vUBZwwr4RftSKvBwFDN3Sys=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=oP7yxT/poST4uDXnlphGILT7Y/94z5+Qo/3+nAT4CsvNd4NncumWGiTQYRJnHj0my uW7t6Unk0tJD8gK9JDL9z99s7AkecxdpHgCHmEQ7ZcZk3/SyKg1fQY9X6+CB7Q0nFX 8s4cIlx5cqBBLSF94kd2u1NU9NtqwBGvAoU5v+DU=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120621085050.0a2e1a60@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:50:01 -0700
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8-01L10ywMfW=2N90AnQRv2U3Vhp=qgJtpRL5KAgC=8XQ@mail.g mail.com>
References: <CADnDZ89XGzmqRTL61rc9MSYRJCjs3BgwSDcM=J+_sKvoR1muEw@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88jqzUpFwkyr9rtGQsoq3fNea_j-g2wpfz2081VrUakZg@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ89fxJo_YbVMrVr+-Q_-nF72W9iG9vZapZNV+1O0gckpow@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120620072437.0ad66a00@resistor.net> <CADnDZ8-kndVu9=4hG=hKPuTu960gEorac2w5gO6XJaL96gGrJA@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8-01L10ywMfW=2N90AnQRv2U3Vhp=qgJtpRL5KAgC=8XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:21:03 -0000

Hi Abdussalam,
At 03:34 21-06-2012, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
>-Why is the document/draft not clear of its aim, objectives,

Paul Hoffman actually asked what was not clear to me.  It does not 
mean that the draft is not clear.

>I agree and want the *consesus* and *community* input to be clear in the draft

The last comment in the message at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg73779.html meant 
that I neither support nor oppose publication.  I was interested in 
seeing your arguments about the draft.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email