Re: I-D affects another or work in ietf groups

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Sun, 10 February 2013 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C3321F8540 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:47:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VzqkCcLGQJ9P for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:47:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com (mail-ob0-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563DF21F84F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:47:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 16so5268114obc.33 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:47:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=c5a6TUh31+hH6U2BvlxeBJ9uKe+4bCDD91+RkxBWJTk=; b=PAjpfSCBxL8lp6nrlNceG09KCjx2qO3ElZym5M83bd1GFh7+m3JwXLTDrDe+6jHGvK ZkHigJ3WoUy6aee61CxjetP14ytwIEb28p24ft6/Qnqnd2q0zR/YoBh6eeAZmTgllh3P pwxsSTRn+C/ekjdnCLCpwulO5HKyJD+arBPDM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=c5a6TUh31+hH6U2BvlxeBJ9uKe+4bCDD91+RkxBWJTk=; b=oMEFYmdYF3YFcwv3RfNOg2IXlKXT/mu/1+4XlK+fYO6dGUqBN8i9Bt9rLJc3/JlODb xeDHtWVUhvfNbFuhaGYNg0gDz4HbqbGLdUNc8fRM/QYUi2LIeeyGjHIOzVg6RZdszkLM Pac5pUXY5Qxb9lrqKEnyDf9G2kiZuNaixZmzzcNrVD7CVttsD2/T0srQKetUjlOQqsFI vqoqBiVjZQGeXyIvxy1qO2MR7tlCteZU72vUh/ly0qnB862hDjHZPzl9u6u4/CoBcu1I I8GESeBrhtNOoqihyP4EN90yZooiC7meHkNsupOH5I2KOB2wPk5TuFQE1BpXs77v7kDm Heqw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.4.165 with SMTP id l5mr8332717oel.84.1360489621122; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:47:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.27.74 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.27.74 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:47:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201302100346.r1A3k4Ue1561926@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <CADnDZ883hHwFw2-aPhzx-KaGCzyEuOhjNf1=58DtiBP8rw0Z5g@mail.gmail.com> <201302100346.r1A3k4Ue1561926@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:47:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzzhc2O7kO8W1bW0mqb4Noiq+qxEeo_ujmztpLsy+RBriQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I-D affects another or work in ietf groups
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8ff1c2e8966e3004d55bac92"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJtFzv0ilFHTW0hj/6AxHQyOL7AdrGi3kKAYWfc4UEOBFH9zb68om6VbzGxU/SUFxtif6l
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:47:03 -0000

On 10 Feb 2013 03:46, "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com> wrote:
> In any case, if you are doing something incorrect in your review,
> presumably people will call your attention to that fact, and explain
> how you should change what you are doing and why you should change it.

And on this note, doing something wrong and being corrected is always a
better choice than not doing something.