IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RTBF, was IETF subpoena processes update and a request

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 25 March 2017 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38C81297E6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pzIBuVj1cLOs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9AE129515 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 48591 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2017 01:18:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 25 Mar 2017 01:18:47 -0000
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:18:25 -0000
Message-ID: <20170325011825.85855.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: RTBF, was IETF subpoena processes update and a request
In-Reply-To: <a5e9202a-1c2e-e7c5-989d-745c7fbeaefb@isi.edu>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-obYV5BjzFJNweDXiLBmR9aWNZQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:18:51 -0000

In article <a5e9202a-1c2e-e7c5-989d-745c7fbeaefb@isi.edu> you write:
>This seems like it also raises the EU's "right to be forgotten"
>principle, which would affect whether the ISOC can archive even notices
>that were originally public.

Only if ISOC were subject to EU law.  Since ISOC has no physical
presence in the EU and the IETF has no office anywhere, I don't see
why EU law would apply.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email