Re: On harassment at IETF

"Dr. Pala" <madwolf@openca.org> Sat, 30 March 2019 11:15 UTC

Return-Path: <madwolf@openca.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3080B120189 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 04:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HK_NAME_DR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C8DPge3uk-2z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 04:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.katezarealty.com (mail.katezarealty.com [104.168.158.213]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5F5120026 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 04:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.katezarealty.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9010374128E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:15:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at katezarealty.com
Received: from mail.katezarealty.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.katezarealty.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DQBM9ufly6l8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 07:15:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Maxs-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [77.241.229.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.katezarealty.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5464E37407F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 07:15:19 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: On harassment at IETF
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <91e75af7-03f9-7565-5a9f-26f5f7bc9f29@openca.org> <FCE33107-1AF5-47B7-9F46-3BDD281E4DEB@live555.com>
From: "Dr. Pala" <madwolf@openca.org>
Message-ID: <79b0861a-b309-876a-47c7-7961e8fbf961@openca.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 12:15:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <FCE33107-1AF5-47B7-9F46-3BDD281E4DEB@live555.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------161731B097ECE5DD63B419D6"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-tMVnALt9RhXgmUcpuo2-go8ftM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:15:24 -0000

Hi Ross,

I understand your point of view and - on the surface, at least - it 
might appear like I am advocating for the same behavior that we are 
trying to prevent. I actually think that if you dig a little deeper, the 
two are very different. I am sorry about the fact that this may have 
come across very strong and lacking compassion - that was not my 
intention. I tend to be very strict when it comes to unjust behavior, 
and the fact that I do really care about this topic does not justify me 
being too harsh or suggest policies/solutions.

One very important aspect I would like to further explain is that in my 
message, in any way, I wanted to imply that people that have experienced 
this issue, should come forward if they do not feel like doing it (for 
absolutely ANY reason) - It is extremely difficult (and requires a lot 
of courage) to speak out. The first priority, I think, as a community, 
is to provide compassion and support to help the individuals to handle 
the situation. And maybe there could be means to allow who reports 
anything to be involved and have their saying about how to handle the 
situation - it could be that no official action is requested, but at 
least we might understand (in an anonymous form even) how widespread 
this issue is.

I do not have the answers - it is a very complex problem. However, as a 
Community I think we need to continue to work on this and strive for a 
safer and happier environment. We try and we might succeed or we might 
fail... and if the latter happens, we just look at why we failed, where 
we can improve, how we can provide a better support network - until we 
finally eradicate this fowl behavior. And if we fail again, we work 
together to improve again.

After all, if this is still going on, maybe we shall think about new 
ways to address this issue.

In my opinion, there is also the possibility for an even harder target. 
Although, I understand that we might not change the world in a day, but 
we could provide a model that could be brought back home to our 
companies and our communities around the world. We might not solve this 
problem around the world, but if we do not even try... what does it say 
about us ?

I thank everybody who replied and I hope this discussion inspired deep 
introspection in each and every one of us: awareness is not a solution, 
but, I think, a good start. Many good points have been raised, and I 
hope that the conversation will continue.

I would be happy to further explore solutions with the ombusteam 
(https://www.ietf.org/contact/ombudsteam/) - if there is an interest to 
continue the conversation in a more appropriate venue (now that, I 
think, we raised a bit the level of awareness in our great Community).

Cheers,
Max


On 3/30/19 1:43 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On the subject of “harassment” - I hope I’m not the only person who sees some irony here:
>
>> And if you are one the people that think this community will tolerate your behavior maybe because you are a well-known figure in the Industry, be sure of one thing: I will fight to make sure that (a) your behavior is publicly exposed, and (b) you get shamed and BANNED from IETF. The behavior, I think, should also be reported to the HR department of the organization that sent that individual for further actions.
-- 
Best Regards,
Massimiliano Pala, Ph.D.
OpenCA Labs Director
OpenCA Logo