Re: [rfc-i] Jim: Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? (was: Re: John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences)

Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> Sat, 31 October 2020 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <masinter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2873A0EBC; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F90wLtWbblNw; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-f54.google.com (mail-lf1-f54.google.com [209.85.167.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79B153A0EA6; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-f54.google.com with SMTP id i6so12342218lfd.1; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tOalRG4IsKdzxRD3u+LFpKFaUv0EMiGIu2+Omr2pSWE=; b=AAADEjJsw24YKALZxfs3kCfvUTUWXFQQ0pGR0V2Rtf0uxRpI8cfunfXlnf3ceq6eG7 BFqbgO6PN+Ss6IirhJ3nO1Kd7sLMuKXnxF7aMIzDs3jpeeuMAaQyg114gu7Uq65aJb4o G94qSLNk8X2pwm8PQUk+r2RAOMcw7ZpJ2sIeWaznsvgWQc20FqHbGhw3oaMvtZy9MZKB L7egoorSXFJ7A/c73DaKlBOStJlFd9+zC6HdPimqa6qxpSi00bVGPiRe6kVOwoR8SWI4 Jx22ZjloB0/k3M7Hfkwy8zd1g8HDUogHBqk0KxTD4N6CcXIy8o7EZokqmrEZVuMXqV34 8Ktg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533SzuTjcFlD5B6b6NGVAdyO0dkVUKIOyJCgg0KgtF6qWsrsGPrR 88nxfz5AYVIxj8KJrYQCD4kt5icKp8DMcJzsASs7YVU3O2M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0s3hHMtPA+JrFeNDFHr3ZnB8W7LMbBnLS6dK+QznnwS8/evq1U6lGyO+naeh9OdQa8b+911gpjgt8PQzX7ok=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:793:: with SMTP id 141mr3376496lfh.190.1604176632596; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201026181442.GA2438@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CADaq8jdSeTDWy_0fCV25ykxKFMV1ZBtUMMNesoOuaXCzFVfpOA@mail.gmail.com> <D2D0455D-8D6C-4A19-ACAE-4DD972D83DC1@bluepopcorn.net> <20201028164053.GB12700@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <263C265C19B24BA97AF48934@PSB> <225062D7-C061-4543-8665-53A4F4831510@isc.org> <20201029005519.GT39170@kduck.mit.edu> <A05242FC-C38C-474F-A2AC-412329CA5C52@isc.org> <CAKq15ve-kAFZWH_f7=1XXC5PfxvO-sAzppB1fVTyqUufLftkVg@mail.gmail.com> <D2DB703DBF2A44A19B8F80DD@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <D2DB703DBF2A44A19B8F80DD@PSB>
From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:37:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKq15vdFVkG6_grNtqUqq-yDwj9QQcHJFZB5+RB-8fdxQXhFSw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Jim: Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? (was: Re: John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences)
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, rsoc@iab.org, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000057cbf905b2fd7a8e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-uoqXmvCfRhuKcagcZIlt-3zyyA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 20:37:16 -0000

in lieu of some (useless) warning text about paginations, make MIME-type
relative URIs more useful.

Consider what it would take to make a hyperlink of the
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6924 form
         urn:ietf:rfc:2324#Section_2.3.2
work better than
        https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc2324.pdf#page=5

to use the same fragID for text, HTML, pdf, XML ?

RFC 5147 is an obstacle, but suppose it only applies to text/plain so
they could be served as text/rfc

I don't know how widely https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8118#section-3 is
implemented.