Re: Enough is Enough.

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 20 October 2020 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6173A121F; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QWFifug1rMy5; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75003A0CD7; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id b15so4783817iod.13; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Pg+5gXJH0ikDdrvXg4+/jdUIMrBFZPYE7hp2vZbX8Ps=; b=Q1w7z5QcIy9EzAy62ThxoCQoCswS7ig8F6r2aoqkrPWj2CPHMDUSi9Db0qAOhqg007 pMb5fRFg77rNkq5NJcZBIhsI7d2wYgwSsX/MkGLT23hW37vG3UHMtnzjvQ2SZGUPZmR8 FoM29xf1SyjAZXTO65zoz1X2YJ4aKB6QPQJaLmP9lRIr6YVe1tUo2waKgE70Ij1kpsEy Zbgj34ZVJMntI/u9NP82qcxVP6hPzO4Xzq3Hb2eKy+cq23BFw4WQmK1a1ACrNK15paCG KBd4ZBTicRuMjpwKEfaIjy325sEGxYB78TxgVVkeKY8Xl6aMDQJp90584D+gtdvVTAhE L4Rg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Pg+5gXJH0ikDdrvXg4+/jdUIMrBFZPYE7hp2vZbX8Ps=; b=FwvqAMEvHP28AKDM0n+h73tBI6D0N7zh/HqYhw0LK9zcl5rwP8YGydr1gxtG1atcKP AUteM00z3XpQX8wgN33BG/+Tu4bh6v1GlnTsOChc+YamnVsWzsTknAGwwY5hnIWUjBAK uAQ1ELC1njivGUslphmKjQYgR98Fx2aD6Ec5QmyL/g5boEpWrBrBiN8V3x4CMI/g6tYl oJfUVnDgCWwbyly0HNmoNTaufrA3WWNxX1tYcOntLauiLecPeewDtfRWSpIcWLUieLEW aw+i3V5hnyJW0j4Gj4Z+9d7PW432c0W4nHfh1Na0VVAT5P2YdU9d+91qjtYGU1b4GbwG /mlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dtGzQgA8LJ4M0JixcpP9O9zCvuHezet5TerGsMWMI24EdrrYy ANOUClz5hC6Eqlg87klLkSrzD6KyjrKdiQq2mj0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJ5Xulvm0QVsfSsVaCanAl166elK648fRlytFUz2gI4XlFhJO8JroqZBnLICPiuZSXINagCc8EhCt0ZqHbC60=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9f0e:: with SMTP id q14mr3020372iot.185.1603216123060; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <VI1P194MB02851798998F8B7CAE17EBEBAE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <1244503240.69594.1603213781185@email.ionos.com> <VI1P194MB028587C3EBD5F3B842444C24AE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB028587C3EBD5F3B842444C24AE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:48:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHhpaDUPswSPxNPtsx_daUdo95cADgk9LYDOnnRwnPkUw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Enough is Enough.
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "legal@ietf.org" <legal@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/02MT03I8XRlEb36Y8yqsCMi-UTs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:48:46 -0000

Khaled,

You should give the file names if you submit a request related to
drafts particularly as it seems that these drafts, except
draft-omar-ipv10-12, do not follow the convention of including your
name as the second token.

Assuming the other drafts have the same copyright and license notice
as draft-omar-ipv10-12, you have granted copyright in these drafts
jointly to the IETF Trust and yourself. The IETF Trust licenses IETF
participants as in
https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/IETF-TLP-5.pdf particularly
Section 3.

In my opinion, these drafts should not and will not be deleted. They
will time out six months after posting and be removed from the active
directory.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 1:15 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jay,
>
>
>
> Could you please do the following request?
>
>
>
> Deleting these IDs completely from the IETF repository:
>
>
>
> 1)     Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10).
>
> 2)     IPmix.
>
> 3)     KHALED Routing Protocol (KRP).
>
> 4)     Regional Routing Protocol (RRP).
>
> 5)     Numbering Exchange Protocol (NEP).
>
> 6)     Satellite Internet (SI).
>
> 7)     ASN Label Switching Protocol (ALSP).
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Khaled Omar
>
>
>
> From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 7:10 PM
> To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>; ietf@ietf.org
> Cc: ietf-draft-submission@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Enough is Enough.
>
>
>
> I would ask an IESG member.  And I think Jay Daley offered up legal@ietf.org on a different thread.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/20/2020 1:00 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear IETFers,
>
>
>
> I hope this is my last e-mail with the IETF and I’m not feeling coward to repeat my first request regarding deleting my drafts from the IETF repository.
>
>
>
> Can anyone tell me whom is the responsible person for deleting drafts from the IETF?
>
>
>
> P.S. I don’t want to find any BCP or whatever that mention that the original author of the draft has not the right to ask for deleting his drafts as this doesn’t make any sense.
>
>
>
> I wish you good luck after the deletion and the ideas not being used by the IETF as they have no benefits as many claims.
>
>
>
> Sorry for any disturbance.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Khaled Omar
>
>
>
>