IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Tue, 23 February 2021 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1DD3A0E7F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:42:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=B66JBJb2; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=QUADB6gT
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZqTVCENXdMd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:42:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 599663A0E95 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:42:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16AEB5A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:42:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap7 ([10.202.2.57]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:42:16 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=CbIPs56 wd+MMmgKuGW7KilgzYlTxc3br9pciBs2F+pM=; b=B66JBJb2lFndFfCoK5ZyRYT 0p7qt/JdVoJ24PAIK+8so2IdGk4DHMMkCXE7X8Fo9lSpIisjQy76Gsx1DqBgUCgM xJIYOiK40iYCW42o7IilpaPWL5k8Xl92Opzte5xWrsmq1WWo/VKEnj/4vnG5wNCO 5ohySmGwT0a4THfeCtlBCjPurJwWpeR6MXBu1VYbrNDUhxf4wdr/iV6NFM4YIpJI tU36z2+pqY21GueIPl5BNC+o9pcIAmTdXH1LGrYEKKbIZ8w9db26/+fETAlcLV8c ci0KjFnq7NJcxmpBLdlAfTe2gdsA1PEXlaFbFYSX2ozPZfYNuW8QFu4bbthdAlQ= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=CbIPs5 6wd+MMmgKuGW7KilgzYlTxc3br9pciBs2F+pM=; b=QUADB6gTB/Qv/m/M8f9bBT NO24y60ZdvOhwEgXOD44FHpiE3LB2wzvNvhcmZJUAjFNAOpLaytqi9txeU+1CzW3 SCPMOmj4SfjSxzvpX4QkyvEBrF649x9JuX9o3jrK8wNAV/AdlhnEi5LBw9uA0/bO KJ8UUi2gycoqo5iN6XSzn9nSxwdmvAsZfBKvhFWXqR5PadI0y/m5deLyeHguty4b AE+JuFVHILxQvPPUfSkYmaDijagFYkQ1sSzf9fM6B3H8gn0Ysr6aEkoLEKbU0BxD Ghw7LoB9LNXQxM9OzYP8jUKBvLpwqnlZ50OBWIaOgoRtJvq7UG1RqxLJYCBDX8Pg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:x4Q1YAcRE1KA2BbkODU0WWJWoR8mScSd3MU7LHCLppuTF_0Kbxlhzg> <xme:x4Q1YCOm1B8Mg2hxdBB_3dySNPkm6kmgu51BjgMnJ1WvCPlViKztS9DuT1P59BJ_6 f9ZG2eZ9LU>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeehgdduieefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtd erreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfuehrohhnucfiohhnugifrghnrgdfuceosghrohhnghes fhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvudeuieehgf dvheeuueejjeeuudfgiefgveetfeelteeffffgtdejjefgueduvdenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsrhhonhhgsehfrghsthhmrg hilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:x4Q1YBiHchT5ti-Ov-1HIo29-HalRAAyTXPNTPvjhMIuB6uyWmkUyQ> <xmx:x4Q1YF-BJjk4T56Kjt0X7CAs20WEw2PvQ67IOO9xIcsyjTR7P-nyOg> <xmx:x4Q1YMszeM8FS0JlV1qYvq65VsDLqHqSxdYYyTx7RIT6_4l8W4ZP8A> <xmx:yIQ1YK71W8eqNghLpHxwjwVuELke7MbClpiXnNd76RjI2OVAoz1NsA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id B468A36051A; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:42:15 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-179-g81f7aba968-fm-20210222.002-g81f7aba9
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <eef92b1d-4312-45c4-8d47-92df4b311b2b@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBP_rQVJetNk8K5VmvWHoDE8A3nWwLDUiYN2U9dJJ6shhg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com> <3c2d646d-f18d-4d88-b458-29dbd486432b@beta.fastmail.com> <AM0PR08MB371669108E9CEA561BEC9EF6FA809@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <d6648437-332b-4668-a1c7-591f2c287539@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CADNypP8GKTY-Jhpb6AEfcpXOihwLap7OrrByNemGc2GNvZLeog@mail.gmail.com> <10fd9d2d-afb4-44aa-b618-fb5ce1efa69e@dogfood.fastmail.com> <c21477c8f68047cabac7aeae60a688f2@cert.org> <CAHbuEH7Qvc3AaBxbk1kXd4knS4_+Wrs3P7WNETRNNoFP-dGNCA@mail.gmail.com> <A59DA7B8-8573-4AAE-A888-7B186DED956B@mnot.net> <CADNypP-NdUVtn60A_XHg3dOCFn4D=kYyc8C1ucZ5PK5_OOTPOw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBP_rQVJetNk8K5VmvWHoDE8A3nWwLDUiYN2U9dJJ6shhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:41:54 +1100
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="ddcd4ae385024b99b87667ee3cbbdaa1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/094Tj1ZpIumTmIJo28JQJvQoHc4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:42:25 -0000

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021, at 09:39, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Replying to Rifaat's e-mail but not replying to him specifically.
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> I don't think the question of whether OAuth is a good or bad WG group is really a productive one in general, and it's especially hard for me to see how it's going to let us make progress on questions of DEI. This seems like precisely the kind of thing that's going to lead to a bunch of hard feelings without making progress. I think we can all agree that the IETF culture isn't perfect and that there are cases where we make it hard for new people to get involved, so maybe we could focus instead on those aspects of our culture.
> 
> I would suggest that if people have problems with the way the OAuth WG is being run they ought to take it up with the AD (Roman Danyliw), or, failing that, on the IETF list.

Agree - and sorry for derailing the conversation with this thing!

Bron.

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email