IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc))

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 18 July 2014 01:08 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21841A03B8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 18:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9yqgAEFl9UeY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 18:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35AEF1A033A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 18:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w62so3878812wes.15 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 18:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AZA2zLV+5j3WS76/1w13xydpcIwbLxc7uwsqUuHhtAc=; b=kLw+LeCIUlGgnkoAqBWKwiCrrp6IsWxxaBMYJmnkm7w7tnBvYJlFgkSysAtiCMiYgQ r1SbTGeh2WCdssj/MlIWAxA8GHBKZJGVIEO1cSNASIIcS+ewRGxWDOSycSqcoqe+/LuL 2LtgHHMBCvSiZ4dDRdc76tqGo+k7s2meL1w8yotx3W7YGcJqDO4Ok2qFF64SgBY6BxX4 KYT7PIpo6VZoYHePpEQscfytSRZdbvEjBP+zP+kIYZQuGccrlZL3fONG4WYDS3z+75Xt 1qvTIwmBeNZXjlvkite/CwRIdLMQD6GNEwSn6K74VV229XRYAvrzKynMDr4EUc6tBupS HIVQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.81.234 with SMTP id d10mr2473981wiy.79.1405645690746; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 18:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.10.99 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 18:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+63a2p13tApNOB7TDQs2Lcz7woQ0-rvNcavgFJQQ0LOQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140714164212.22974.20340.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140716100922.0ceba268@resistor.net> <53C70443.8020709@dcrocker.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20140716161255.0ac7a6f0@elandnews.com> <53C71991.3040909@bbiw.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20140716200958.0cb6d4c8@elandnews.com> <CAC4RtVB895qQam48dqpG7CX+YCxPp0-5Er8j_=NR-YexTQRtmA@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140717072736.0ddb14c0@elandnews.com> <CALaySJ+_R=kxdf3E94kA=+S2gHaht9vSrkPQYdREnsqdWLJGkw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140717120908.0ddd9a80@elandnews.com> <CALaySJ+ND3Z0UX_i+dTi67RWH_ESVn+LyHyLQBSBJC5dxmL6Kg@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140717141709.0d26ea10@elandnews.com> <CALaySJLx0sdOxEPAFmyMuaE+xajBnOgAWxy3i63Y3VHPBc8e3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwY+718mC1kcFZV8Rb9RunntQRc=9U21MTiHX22tdjAX+w@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+63a2p13tApNOB7TDQs2Lcz7woQ0-rvNcavgFJQQ0LOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 18:08:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbw49o=xx2DNDcKHgqye-n0qQHerkA8=MBaJtP-VLRS2A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Registration policies (was: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc))
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0442813413c21404fe6d64cc"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0AjeZUDqHAmF7D8ermocZWuD97I
Cc: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 01:08:13 -0000

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
wrote:

>
>> For the sake of comparison (and hopefully clarification), what's an
>> example of an IANA action that does create work for the IETF, such that the
>> IESG would object?
>>
>
> I think I gave one a couple of times: creating a registry that requires a
> designated expert (Expert Review or Specification Required) is what we've
> objected to.  It commits the IESG to appointing and manageing one or more
> DEs, without approval that comes with IETF consensus.
>
>
Sorry, I'd lost track of the thread.  You did indeed.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email