Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative

Phillip Hallam-Baker <> Thu, 04 December 2014 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBF71A004B for <>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 10:57:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YLIiR3dx1HGd for <>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 10:57:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E359C1A0033 for <>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 10:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id w7so14789390lbi.1 for <>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:57:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=7DdpD6ofA8J7WF0Ktx2hb78Gx1TPvskcYrPaBo8xwYg=; b=G0+GAXiyfgO5Y0LnK5X4/W2G36M9oHpTDLUjdiYcw1+vOJIXx0F2vv1TcM1qPtop/w OnJzMC/1FYwhS4/AnXYMqjxXdJgbtJ9N1in4ynBakkXFAnXsQ7brSBeqae3pphmvT5Lz lZs2adgif/qzCRDmiJ2fcmJtoBmNUqq2RipvClpaSDrfi+05ND9Wv4gnOgiqhrKOpHhH tQ1+NG4urRORsywIdO/+vHXyob7gjf8AW6Jl3lGo+kTRpvECvs6pG0uqzyD4j2XqlvT+ ffH37yhnPcd7Zxk9pAMuUNLNgfC9FXJkLMsv+krZugmBcqrUaE4Zf1BEiaTTEBUgeRsK RKDw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id w3mr11002649lag.24.1417719470331; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 10:57:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:57:50 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: zy4y3ZpAlVKQm9Qv7FPdPMGvE68
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <>
To: IAB <>, IETF <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:57:53 -0000

I am a little confused by this proposal.

The statement of principles seems relatively unobjectionable. But
there seems to be rather less information on specific objectives and
virtually none on how those objectives would be achieved.

There is a proposal for a council but no information on how the
members are to be appointed or what the source or scope of their
authority will be.

There are three questions of power: How did you get it? Whose
interests do you serve when you use it? and How do we get rid of you?
I don't see answers to any of those questions in the documents