Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal

Rob Austein <sra@isc.org> Fri, 04 April 2008 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CCA3A682A; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF26C3A6783; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V+GeApzGaMB9; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net (cyteen.hactrn.net [66.92.66.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2969F3A6A9B; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thrintun.hactrn.net (thrintun.hactrn.net [IPv6:2002:425c:4242:0:219:d1ff:fe12:5d30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "thrintun.hactrn.net", Issuer "Grunchweather Associates" (verified OK)) by cyteen.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C3DB28450; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 03:51:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from thrintun.hactrn.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by thrintun.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D7322808; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:51:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:51:27 -0400
From: Rob Austein <sra@isc.org>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal
In-Reply-To: <38455B35-10D5-4D3F-8FE5-68ADDA075FE7@multicasttech.com>
References: <C41ADEF3.F363%alain_durand@cable.comcast.com> <38455B35-10D5-4D3F-8FE5-68ADDA075FE7@multicasttech.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Message-Id: <20080404035127.34D7322808@thrintun.hactrn.net>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

At Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:42:53 -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> 
> That assumes that every attendee is representing a company, which is  
> certainly not
> always true.

IETF badges already ask for company afiliation, so at least we'd be
being consistant in our silliness.

I still have fond memories of the gentleman at the Oslo IETF who asked
me, apparently in all seriousness, what "On Sabatical" sold.

On the gripping hand, I tend to agree that this is a problem we don't
need to solve.
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf