IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Hotel situation

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Fri, 18 December 2015 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5601B3714 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:45:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HydIzCKcHqHt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:45:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FED11B370E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:45:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tBIGjKwX025829; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:45:20 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk tBIGjKwX025829
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1450457121; bh=rxh+NdPm/xFAQ3mZsvCsWuuNd3A=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=eAwyF9yT1Gx02B9ZgWWfpIAsA6Q3jiIqT84EbOxEd6Z8k3eDmVyu0TQft2uCBz94L h3yCHDhraV1VZOUk8VYMhJHBo1X07i9EcVTQFJfhxAVBqfKO07CgDGA9j02ngrR+/3 wmJZ7GFOC1eoiuIMZzIW9BoJgIco5qzyd3w56ZFI=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id rBHGjK2726708910RK ret-id none; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:45:21 +0000
Received: from 20010a88d51011.ipv6.customer.clara.net (20010a88d51011.ipv6.customer.clara.net [IPv6:2001:a88:d510:1101:f42d:fa5c:56e3:eb09] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tBIGjDUi012623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:45:14 GMT
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7F72AADA-52F4-4C9B-BAF4-2854D723F7EE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <7A7519D5-FD9B-4F4D-A7E5-AC047F684623@netapp.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:45:13 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|02dedadbe5e65aac9732e9359a7c2dberBHGjK03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|E7D065D8-CADC-4A65-8AC7-6ECE9CF63D4F@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <567192F3.9090506@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <56719864.8010604@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09C09@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <56719B42.2040902@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1512160924570.39773@rabdullah.local> <D296DF8F.8DA39%glenn.deen@nbcuni.com> <1DEF233B-FBA8-4750-AB4B-3E0F55822C9E@isoc.org> <D297326B.8DCF8%glenn.deen@nbcuni.com> <CAC8QAcf=yAAGVN35tUCpX38y6_qGstGhK4iYuyhK94LVWrz-+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iL+eAFtGHKXVWMHaqi=3mGO9H1CfE4e=yZCekE9UzPR6A@mail.gmail.com> <7A7519D5-FD9B-4F4D-A7E5-AC047F684623@netapp.com> <E7D065D8-CADC-4A65-8AC7-6ECE9CF63D4F@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=rBHGjK272670891000; tid=rBHGjK2726708910RK; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=3:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: tBIGjKwX025829
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0KHPyWB0P1vh6LO8m67HOBI6HwY>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:45:26 -0000

> On 18 Dec 2015, at 08:36, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2015-12-17, at 19:10, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net <mailto:warren@kumari.net>> wrote:
>> Perhaps if IETF attendees didn't demand everything that we do (lots of breakout rooms, walking distance to bars and restaurants, no trains, the ability to install and run our own network, not being in Minneapolis, large cookies, specific price points, a willingness to keep going back to the same N locations) we wouldn't have so much kvetching.
> 
> +1

Indeed, Minneapolis is great!

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email