IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Updated potential meeting location list

Ross Finlayson <finlayson@live555.com> Thu, 20 February 2020 04:12 UTC

Return-Path: <finlayson@live555.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370201200C1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 20:12:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HImzo8zOV70h for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 20:12:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us.live555.com (us.live555.com [52.8.240.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AC7A12002E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 20:12:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.live555.com [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by us.live555.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01K4CPh7070676 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 20:12:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from finlayson@live555.com)
From: Ross Finlayson <finlayson@live555.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Subject: Re: Updated potential meeting location list
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:12:25 +1300
References: <158216966829.17661.75511909982202631.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <12588269-A1C9-420B-9B32-7ED8EA923DE7@consulintel.es> <AE306706-4FEF-4102-8A04-DACD40A6187A@ietf.org>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <AE306706-4FEF-4102-8A04-DACD40A6187A@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <13820272-7189-4803-A842-EA86FE051C10@live555.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0LopAm7j1FN-xO5XCQpcLijIDlA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:12:28 -0000

It might be useful to give the *complete* list of cities that have been “assessed as suitable”, rather than just those that “have been added to those assessed as suitable”.  For example, several cities where the IETF has met recently - e.g. Prague, Berlin, Vienna, London, Paris - were not mentioned, yet Vancouver (where we have met many times, and are about to meet again) is listed in the "have been added to those assessed as suitable” list.  So the list is a little confusing.

Also, FYI, “Malta” is a country, not a city.  (Presumably you mean “Valletta".)

It’s also a little surprising that no cities in Australia or New Zealand are listed.  (We met in Adelaide in 2000.)  I would expect to see Sydney and Melbourne considered as potential venues, as well as possibly Brisbane, Perth, and Auckland (New Zealand).

	Ross.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email