Re: [rfc-i] Soliciting feedback: starting a satisfaction survey for the RFC Production Center and Publisher
Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 16 January 2019 16:18 UTC
Return-Path: <rse@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A719A130E57 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:18:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iLkTKBbJQwU2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:18:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 553ED12D4F0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:18:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5011C5B45; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:18:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MIZN4HVnXTlp; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:18:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Heathers-MacBook-Pro-2.local (c-71-231-216-10.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [71.231.216.10]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80EA81C5B44; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:18:21 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Soliciting feedback: starting a satisfaction survey for the RFC Production Center and Publisher
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, ietf@ietf.org
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <1a60f985-eba4-de04-6750-0a4cc9895652@rfc-editor.org> <d2204912-38cc-3ff6-d3a4-6dae09d42e78@gmx.de>
From: Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <d954aa19-bec3-4a87-4727-9374dc58c577@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:18:29 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d2204912-38cc-3ff6-d3a4-6dae09d42e78@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0MrgdFg70HyddYSlCqT8KCqoj3I>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:18:32 -0000
On 1/16/19 7:57 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2019-01-16 16:21, Heather Flanagan wrote: >> Hello community, >> >> In order to get a better sense of how well the RFC Production Center >> and Publisher are serving the needs of authors, I would like to start >> sending out a short survey to authors immediately after the >> publication of their RFC starting on February 1, 2019. Participation >> in the survey is entirely optional, but the expectation is that >> requesting feedback immediately after publication will be more >> effective than the current process of randomly selecting a percentage >> of authors who have published in the previous year and asking them to >> recollect what did and did not work for them. > > But then there might be authors who would *want* to give feedback, but > will not have a new RFC in the next few months. Would you be > interested in that feedback, too? > Hi Julian, I'm always interested in feedback - feel free to send it to me at rse@rfc-editor.org or to the RFC Editor team at rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, or if you think it is something for community discussion, to rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org. That said, this particular survey is looking for feedback during the publication process, so is targeted specifically at authors at time of publication. -Heather
- Soliciting feedback: starting a satisfaction surv… Heather Flanagan
- Re: [rfc-i] Soliciting feedback: starting a satis… Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Soliciting feedback: starting a satis… Heather Flanagan
- Re: [rfc-i] Soliciting feedback: starting a satis… Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Soliciting feedback: starting a satis… Дилян Палаузов
- Re: Soliciting feedback: starting a satisfaction … Michael Richardson
- Re: [rfc-i] Soliciting feedback: starting a satis… Bob Hinden
- Re: [rfc-i] Soliciting feedback: starting a satis… Loa Andersson
- Re: Soliciting feedback: starting a satisfaction … Heather Flanagan