Re: IPv6 traffic stats

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Wed, 12 November 2008 05:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A906C3A689C; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:54:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA753A6947 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:54:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tkFzCLnhdRzu for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netcore.fi (eunet-gw.ipv6.netcore.fi [IPv6:2001:670:86:3001::1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1B33A684D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:54:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netcore.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAC5sYhH011755; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:54:34 +0200
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id mAC5sXUx011751; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:54:34 +0200
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:54:33 +0200
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: IPv6 traffic stats
In-Reply-To: <4919FA68.4030803@alvestrand.no>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0811120747470.11163@netcore.fi>
References: <08111108201165.2a71d.487911088@oregon.uoregon.edu> <20081111185711.GG1588@nsn.com> <4919ED2F.2020101@alvestrand.no> <f1110c510811111249ud4ee387m2169fb84378ec3f4@mail.gmail.com> <4919FA68.4030803@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0811120751281.11163@netcore.fi>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94/8612/Wed Nov 12 00:09:31 2008 on otso.netcore.fi
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> The correct number from the presentation is 0.238% - only Russia, Ukraine and 
> France have more than 0.5% IPv6.
>
> Presentation available from 
> http://rosie.ripe.net/presentations-detail/Thursday/Plenary%2014:00/index.html.

Depends on what you're looking for, but if you are interested in the 
amount of users that have any kind of IPv6 connectivity, this 
undercounts severely because address selection rules on recent OSs 
typically select IPv4 if their connectivity is 6to4 or Teredo.

Mikael Abrahamsson made a test on a p2p-related web-site, and the 
result was that 6% of users had IPv6 connectivity:

http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/v6ops/v6ops.2008/msg01582.html

As shown in later messages, the figure is actually even higher. Teredo 
users running Windows Vista are not included in that 6% because Vista 
doesn't do do AAAA lookups at all if all you have is Teredo 
connectivity.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf