Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Sun, 12 March 2017 02:59 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E5E129443 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:59:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zSGdJArg5biD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:59:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x231.google.com (mail-wr0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F15C81294EE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x231.google.com with SMTP id l37so85140730wrc.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:59:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HTuqMJ0eIgT7tTLAXbRgrHVav8Y0LsJygzS2gF95pX0=; b=o+5VkRdFFUVJWFtbEpFKYtgpSFQamsl2Enybw0Ri+36h512oB68bgxuRMtjDlNl+KY WNm4LhTnE7jHXajLdT9qof3zWCT8Vaj6945ELRrONncDm81teEBe6p4N1zeO6oYJzGsq qLLdpDTIxOUYDAzEeAjnMUp2QrY1dfVOT2wuFhjE6xqGPizBwsK2wcMJLK835CEwk8/d s7l5+RVVSF6BRBCjyR/km6l4jwxLNrpqujOWeNLO5fpV9Z6H1CsA9hfaTfjBZvrlEwF6 8IzM4K2CG+EpIAvehqoigm1TM36s/GVPVJPbKz0/gf7A2mZ8PKjD/M0CRffGNQq5l3K4 1stA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HTuqMJ0eIgT7tTLAXbRgrHVav8Y0LsJygzS2gF95pX0=; b=pRyIT2U28C3zcVOMHzB5ajsIyyjMsWaqlppErFiBCZor3SYTwuA0wntnLbDpBnAVom iBIOtZ0iUdS/SIgMYS5d4I+OeA0Y4QzJ7097S2M545o+Llj0VlT0IlPPkRo8aUfnjysJ d4XtY/QCzCrPtGzno1lk+DQjD9kojQ1vP3y2YFRyuAopJXpVCc70bBloTuJYJEsYn9VL inVduFoBqY8SwUITXodbqnQSHu1wZOm2kdq+gWK6gS+XZVMNcUCDifCkx0U4BdT5OnPM Ei9YLOfVv5kCoWN7qrQDBV0Y3YwyZa6ZLBbQBGANZ3VAr1FduvR76Lg7+2mhTAjaxe+B jNjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lbe23lheROpndDYA5gmW5e+qWcW7qDhVjmnOv5ytSVaX4rTEMbhyZgO/zlEItx8HUuZESC5n0d9Sm67YSX
X-Received: by 10.223.152.215 with SMTP id w81mr24691006wrb.151.1489287541232; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:59:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.181.14 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:58:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <01QBU8WJOCUO0003XB@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <20170308014823.GF30306@kduck.kaduk.org> <382aa5c8-c977-b24d-4d19-251257833b00@gmx.de> <456b4234-0d94-1033-507c-710878bb5159@gmx.de> <20170309055348.GL30306@kduck.kaduk.org> <CAD2gp_TOxcZJxwPoMhq-xp6M+Yq+tQnMUv81YNFp-ydRMpH=5w@mail.gmail.com> <bed0e331-f5fb-f24d-6207-f5a36ec9e7be@gmx.de> <01QBU8WJOCUO0003XB@mauve.mrochek.com>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:58:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD2gp_Q4f+ZsGw_qG5c=z0GoVEJAY2fuLneODXqA9W2byJ0h+g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113c36a6dd285e054a7fc6ea"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0VUUveJmAhqG2107KpyPINP5HF4>
Cc: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 02:59:06 -0000

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> wrote:

This exact issue just came up in a media type review, where someone
> specified a charset parameter because they weren't aware of this algorithm.
>
> It would be very helpful to have this text in the RFC.


Feel free, whoever is the editor now, to add it.

-- 
John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
But that, he realized, was a foolish thought; as no one knew better than
he that the Wall had no other side.
        --Arthur C. Clarke, "The Wall of Darkness"


>
>                                 Ned
>