Re: Last Call: Moving RFC 4405, RFC 4406, RFC 4407 (Sender-ID) to Historic

Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> Wed, 20 June 2018 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <scott@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C14130ECF; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 03:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.028
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DEAR_SOMETHING=1.973, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=bpIMPunZ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=h0j7Xxth
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W1MHPSTuGV-J; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 03:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [208.43.65.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F19E1277D2; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 03:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201803e; t=1529492227; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : date : subject : from; bh=fZTUOGGKX/aP1Uk3tOepYWrWK16T1lPn5MEs6gZ9h/g=; b=bpIMPunZOqzzCyWpMjVic1nd83G8bZsgzBUxj0g/kau/ocCbY9jgkWZx DWvBt8xHE5fr7gqePQJZeZ0ZSyRrCg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201803r; t=1529492227; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : date : subject : from; bh=fZTUOGGKX/aP1Uk3tOepYWrWK16T1lPn5MEs6gZ9h/g=; b=h0j7Xxth0hOZ5aUXtHT/lnrSgGzvAge+hRWfKSJmomGMQY1dUKo0Mb7F JdSq0+WQbedDSmk6FqFrBKGW9eidfP56JkcjpEi34fzvmYWiFRjLbeD94d D8biTbZa7o/J4oCPzwmentrA79OBGezslkPTxEsvrjIyAkHp1VPEfSeDCq z6v1kW44vAmrRHm/rQ7iweP9FvpCCtN2OjTleyeNxL2Q8vDiFhovXOVY4Y IKlD4ay0RRFTtorMNNc55X655EgvxmXCU+0AhABRR3kCJyDx/t29jhoTC+ FG6p8/Nz6zMdq1vyaLQ6snTqI1ynJeoxIaEDhhjPEBtsGgeJyA2+Iw==
Received: from [192.168.1.149] (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B7BCC400E0; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:57:07 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 10:57:06 +0000
In-Reply-To: <3679f35a-f6a8-47e9-9c0a-84b99a388855@isode.com>
References: <152588285893.3989.7909763661642193132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20180619151759.0bf2c2b0@elandnews.com> <3679f35a-f6a8-47e9-9c0a-84b99a388855@isode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Last Call: Moving RFC 4405, RFC 4406, RFC 4407 (Sender-ID) to Historic
To: ietf@ietf.org,iesg@ietf.org
From: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
Message-ID: <A99BF208-ADF3-4949-A7FA-4C5C48D4D07D@kitterman.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0arQu1GtgGn6F2uBFVnzl29VbDM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 10:57:11 -0000


On June 20, 2018 10:44:52 AM UTC, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
>Hi SM,
>
>On 19/06/2018 23:23, S Moonesamy wrote:
>> Dear Internet Engineering Steering Group,
>>
>> There is an item on the agenda above moving RFC 4405, RFC 4406 and
>RFC 
>> 4407 to Historic.  RFC 4405 defines the SUBMITTER Service Extension. 
>
>> Is there any standards action needed for the SMTP Service Extensions 
>> registry?
>I can't think of any actions needed for the SMTP Service Extensions 
>registry. SUBMITTER is not going to be removed from it. Did you think
>of 
>something else?

I would have expected a note to be added indicating the status change..

Scott K