Re: Terminology discussion threads

Sergeant-at-Arms <saa@ietf.org> Wed, 12 August 2020 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <saa@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163793A0E16 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gmf4sCa3Xpzp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mmiller-44677.local (c-24-8-164-51.hsd1.co.comcast.net [24.8.164.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E63AD3A0E19 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Terminology discussion threads
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <9ABDC2BC-E6A3-4249-99C5-F0BB3683A03D@ietf.org> <787999896.771864.1597187546029@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Sergeant-at-Arms <saa@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <8d93366d-4f60-27e0-a19e-36cb0037847f@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 18:56:46 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <787999896.771864.1597187546029@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0dbTgi-F534QR3hTzg7GkhioDjU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 00:56:56 -0000

Hi all,

We wanted to let the list know that the sergeant-at-arms (SAA) team
(described in more detail at [1]) has been in touch with [NAME] off-list
concerning their recent message [2] to ietf@ietf.org under a new subject
line but on the same topic against the direction from the IETF Chair
[3]. We encourage everyone to review the IETF discussion list charter
[4] and our SOP [5].

Thanks,
Matthew Miller on behalf of the SAA team

[1] https://www.ietf.org/how/lists/discussion/
[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UbhPgqdDNjqnL2c4LZzjWR28Q9I/
[3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/t6AZcMH2S_YtldSNBlaNwPfO_P8/
[4] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3005
[5] https://github.com/ietf/saa/blob/master/sop.md