Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 22 December 2014 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39F01A9106 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:21:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6exWBjRdfREy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:21:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB401A9104 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:20:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749702CEC5; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:20:18 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CFSwABi8h7JK; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:20:13 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61792CC4D; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:20:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_33037F57-23E0-4448-8689-6D9BE7A7565C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <395970413857684348872FAB@[192.168.1.128]>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:20:12 +0200
Message-Id: <33E2F86C-8E16-4B93-86D5-00611DD4E6BC@piuha.net>
References: <37B40FAC-C449-4A6F-9E72-0CE416F03191@iab.org> <BD5ACB22-425B-4977-9D48-294E3D63B343@iab.org> <395970413857684348872FAB@[192.168.1.128]>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0hIf6mxazZMTGl8czI-vWI05S0w
Cc: IAB <iab@iab.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:21:14 -0000

John, 

What you said is very similar to the input we’ve been hearing from both the IESG and IAB. And even Russ and I understand the difficulties :-) regardless of how well we managed to succeed in this case.

For what it is worth, our general policy is based on establishing IAB or IETF wide formal opinions on topics and then talking about those, and other kinds of statements should be rare. For a written version of our policy, se http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/SpeakingForIetf - feedback appreciated as always.

Jari