IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Tue, 09 November 2010 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F9C3A68FF; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 21:26:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DUVM9rZQvMXk; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 21:26:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B6A3A68EC; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 21:26:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vws3 with SMTP id 3so2896707vws.31 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:26:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xjTeuIq8UGb9LP2YqfvIFSYtftkVql4iZbPJ4OV5wP8=; b=Q5qVQrMQZpSRMjVyGILmypoTS6dGGcVfijeQ3LzsOn3WJ78HLZGL5SJ1T79nv0FovF SY7amcbWIcz1uSF2MhpId/LVwLqRJUSNa1YXiZfsJHOmQQdEx7IlFUrK/IEhl9OcoXaG 5rPcwdIYIi/hkgu65x5AiK0xbCt2owk9jXUP8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OOD9gid06D0dWNxh//E6FwMXc937/K+CsosUb9qzhYwk2TCVq3NMAHnw89vK7CQXEC yDD3xDTSGrB9AH3jH7LrP5sgTDlJBgBrBNZ+4lKqmHEvtbGIWKyX8/WlIUBbCeZUDZRs DGI+6od1xsWQDWX/7pwNpfd16B2VkI7l2Vj34=
Received: by 10.229.189.14 with SMTP id dc14mr6051222qcb.31.1289280408673; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:26:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-48be.meeting.ietf.org (198-135-0-233.cisco.com [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l14sm159151vcr.18.2010.11.08.21.26.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:26:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4CD8DB8E.9090108@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:26:38 +0800
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
References: <20101108022649.BD7E03A694D@core3.amsl.com> <4CD7607E.8030705@bbn.com> <C58676BCA8DD4B818C8AA5778ECBAB18@23FX1C1>
In-Reply-To: <C58676BCA8DD4B818C8AA5778ECBAB18@23FX1C1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 05:26:30 -0000

On 11/08/2010 12:47 GMT+08:00, David Harrington wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> part of the justification is to have the BOF early in the week so
> people can discuss it during the week.
> 
> dbh 

Yes, that's important, and better than what we have now.

I think that of what I've heard so far, the idea of scheduling 2 BOFs at
a time, all of Monday and whatever it takes of Tuesday, sounds most
likely to work.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email