Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 07 April 2016 02:19 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A119612D61F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lWfe5wAkYVH8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F3912D13A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.11.242] (104-60-96-29.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [104.60.96.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u372JB1F023471 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:19:11 -0700
Subject: Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, ietf@ietf.org
References: <09ff01d1905c$f15d4e70$d417eb50$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <5705C39E.30807@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 19:19:10 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <09ff01d1905c$f15d4e70$d417eb50$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 19:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0vImjZeql153C0T5u1EgU53lLv0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 02:19:14 -0000
On 4/6/2016 4:34 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > How do we move on so: ... > - this problem does not recur What you probably do not mean is 'we do not go to Singapore again. What you probably /do/ mean is that further venue selections avoid places that effectively serve to exclude participation by various constituencies. Or at least, that is what I hope you mean, because it has broader utility. So I'll repeat what I said at the virtual microphone: If the community wishes meeting venue selection to refrain from choosing specific places, the community needs to develop that list. Anything less specific leaves too much to interpretation, which guarantees that similar errors will recur. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- "We did not know" is not a good excuse Adrian Farrel
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Dave Crocker
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Melinda Shore
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Harish Pillay
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Melinda Shore
- RE: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Adrian Farrel
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Harish Pillay
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Melinda Shore
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Harish Pillay
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse John C Klensin
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse lloyd.wood
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Dave Crocker
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Ted Lemon
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Stewart Bryant
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse John C Klensin
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Dave Crocker
- RE: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Adrian Farrel
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Stefan Winter
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse John C Klensin
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Stewart Bryant
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse John Levine
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Dave Crocker
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse John C Klensin
- Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse Lee Howard