IETF Logo Mail Archive

Anonymous postings

SM <sm@resistor.net> Mon, 21 October 2013 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF0C11E84EC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U3VstQEKKdQS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4469111E81FF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9LKM2mt010068; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1382386927; bh=GgaD1/pjE0KfdO3mUbx11Ys//gdecrMTIg8l5Ua6Sr4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=gCAAYzNlW7WPJk32xyAS1LpmIkdP9ih5l4mJYlpsIcv03RyfGG4F5ItDaROHqWiKq /9xlbpPPOPCmPvn45x2LCjliT79TXECB/Zv/jneN5lPAp5dZJf2P/OSF2+hnN66Dtu ksCc6pCS8jjVpDq0P3KLlZ0RWg3naDJGjt65H4nI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1382386927; i=@resistor.net; bh=GgaD1/pjE0KfdO3mUbx11Ys//gdecrMTIg8l5Ua6Sr4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=VuVHMtUZqeueOVkWewwAO3M8b0iubiM1VmBpIIJ7eb4cmo4n8UlfcRYhrCSzvXFP+ Zk1Vpf5RIWWpZMxuEZRBH499UqDWdy1ZkgICClo8OEeSqYnhv2kS7sT71BgptlDYrO D8uy3q31dTmKEbOa6WvZAXmeaKFCccov1IuT9IHw=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131021130523.0c4a6db8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:18:07 -0700
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Anonymous postings
In-Reply-To: <52657B0B.3080701@gmail.com>
References: <5262FB95.8080500@gmail.com> <CAK41CSRKhD9W5WWm3xBJeb4U8Q6TbfG1EHnY_0BN7fC1QvO=iA@mail.gmail.com> <52657B0B.3080701@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:22:16 -0000

At 12:05 21-10-2013, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>1. We shouldn't tolerate anonymous postings in any case.

There is a thread at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg05855.html and 
one at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81133.html

It is better to focus on the content instead of the messenger.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email