IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Tue, 04 December 2012 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAB021F86DD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:14:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-kRFAIluYxP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:14:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3838B21F86AB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:14:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so5089855vba.27 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:14:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VZXlQof8PNWODSF1UrTnBH6Rb2BOMtL1AwsQfDCq1tA=; b=tB8XT3aSjVApVmvNqF1tNRsL24zwmBUpReHnOIwO+sFATBlAqxD0uy3btNef830Y/n t+E5tsanSReqjWlhCD1I9ne91tiiZUNHJqlLBIMe+Akmw32aPBXFJnD86Hl45b/FQay1 11wjv2f69iqKoRBvMjS6aeBg1g59f15KpBHeRh+4rYce2MZXgxHn6gF5+qc2pKCt5v+2 gtwg2m6ecmoPDDVsCXHrwwmimcszUTZj8IEXvkpaKjZhyBxSEiHuPdz43pC+wn/1ZMQH rPqImxantxcNdNzhGkh5Xg+u4zhXwrPVd7vgqhbT9MO+SFpOLLNxEnQdkgRgG4EKD6oF 3Zmg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.64.168 with SMTP id p8mr913657vds.125.1354630452189; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:14:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.145.5 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:14:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ894SLhPDcNtFBi=RypmWS3cW8yegcjLp-2FWLsrPqDKng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADnDZ894SLhPDcNtFBi=RypmWS3cW8yegcjLp-2FWLsrPqDKng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:14:12 +0000
Message-ID: <CADnDZ88PyhTHOwVRxBF6vRHBV=TqDT4xLhrjPiDXtZRwnnc5Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3071d004e79b4504d0077a7a"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:14:14 -0000

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Abdussalam Baryun <
abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> >But there's no formal process for that, and I think
> >that's how we want it to be.
>
> I don't want no formal in a formal organisation, usually unformal process
> only happen in unformal organisations, so is IETF a formal or non-formal. I
> beleive we are in a formal so our managers (chairs and ADs) SHOULD follow
> formal procedures and participants MAY do both.
>
> I read the procedures and this is what I came out with if I am wrong
> please refer me to where does the procedure mention that WG Chairs have
> such authority.
>
>
>

Now we got an I-D to explain the creation of WG drafts and the formal
Chairs duties in this matter, please read below

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-crocker-id-adoption-00


AB

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email