Re: REMINDER: Call for Comment on 'Affirmation of the Modern Paradigm for Standards'
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 24 October 2012 13:24 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F4121F882E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.071
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.071 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.179, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oWs8W0zer8NR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [192.134.4.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3D121F882D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C0302801A1; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:24:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F9F280127; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:24:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2219:8::6:69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5E3B38004; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:23:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:23:35 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: REMINDER: Call for Comment on 'Affirmation of the Modern Paradigm for Standards'
Message-ID: <20121024132335.GA25725@nic.fr>
References: <018e01cda7ba$036c0960$0a441c20$@iab.org> <20121024065728.GA32267@nic.fr> <16992A95-66EF-42E9-9170-A24FC008BECA@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <16992A95-66EF-42E9-9170-A24FC008BECA@vigilsec.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: iab@iab.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:24:38 -0000
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:18:38AM -0400, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote a message of 27 lines which said: > The document captures the affirmation that took place on 29 August > 2012. The document needs to contain the words that were affirmed. > Any changes are a future activity, not associated with this > document. Precisely my point: why a Call for Comments if the document can no longer be modified?
- Re: REMINDER: Call for Comment on 'Affirmation of… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: REMINDER: Call for Comment on 'Affirmation of… Russ Housley
- Re: REMINDER: Call for Comment on 'Affirmation of… Stephane Bortzmeyer