Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard

Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com> Thu, 01 September 2005 15:39 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EAr9Y-0007bg-NC; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:39:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EAr9W-0007ba-Dt for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:38:58 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA11292 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:38:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sa.vix.com ([204.152.187.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EArBU-0002Rb-6T for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:41:01 -0400
Received: from sa.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sa.vix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D7213921; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:38:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vixie@sa.vix.com)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:09:54 +0200." <20050901150954.GA30610@nic.fr>
References: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA1096B57F@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <1125557508.16485.25.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com> <20050901145817.CBF0D13CDF@sa.vix.com> <20050901150954.GA30610@nic.fr>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:38:48 +0000
Message-Id: <20050901153848.72D7213921@sa.vix.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, 112@root-servers.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

# But what about the other direction? When IETF reserves a name, is it
# always null-routed to AS112? It does not seem so, ".example" (RFC
# 2606), for instance, is not "delegated".

if as112 is asked, my bet is, as112 will cooperate.

for .example, as112 wasn't asked.  (yet?)

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf