Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions (fwd) Jo-Philipp Wich: [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions
Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 14 December 2016 14:40 UTC
Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73644128B37 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:40:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2yp0DOUenC-q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wj0-x229.google.com (mail-wj0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EDE41295C8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:35:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wj0-x229.google.com with SMTP id xy5so36776983wjc.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:35:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=JSn3JqAi3jqI483fuPiMOII4rTd74jpCDlWjgH9zZ/Q=; b=hxlGl0C5qcyMhxvym2U+G6erBwJ7nzYw9nla2pQ7r/ck8CZS6SeIGxyULJzmvLKDNZ /j9nS1iDLieXKPg3rdNJweKCS41oiS+wtuM0t9e7bda+SwJ+DwXyw2SKhveJFjOrENrO rNSqftUMlxzOBrvW6mNRuJU+7OdD4/qj/FZRKGlajdmNrAe+Q8m4h2AB8pJ6IY/nJAmV BIrZdr1pTz9TiXQrC81PXR/G6J0f8bT/l2ogc9xQO6CGN6FtO/VYNtOHkWV2Xyz0aIAh usex9uiQYwsK7lEvRoARHx9MMcXL2Nkr/EbcJZtze4R1EC+n9/vGU4jk+tGlTmN0+ZyV MXgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=JSn3JqAi3jqI483fuPiMOII4rTd74jpCDlWjgH9zZ/Q=; b=HYZdFmgv9I5NEllLBITV99XcLaX8svWoklLidU7fPkjvywDNUaPHuKhxDSXg2NXxO3 Stf+hYmimEnJbXZE4yj82S3UHUeebqVGSWvWBr1wWEJ2wn9ZnUXgj1DIRj8b/zhOhwmG Zl0WM0IdvA0yMp2uFMRoKZRDbp4fc9wmFDQON+3hOcntC32F0KhbKpdxryJc9V6q1VvQ 3xEOkRRsX+ItOFiwK+Z9EwEQAMDq+r3WuPbkcW5Xd3mIHxQNEorJMCv45V5EScPO/7/S LhTm0sXR32353xSPs2kD7wZ6jJw197/nu0LBkNm3KM6liGpF8ZyB0RaQhGZAR/qcaWhD kAmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02iruOuqVYidTP45/Ac3mogBALmmaKPvKf58w6dpPkYXmTp5lC2zc0a4lcLsUKx/g==
X-Received: by 10.195.11.41 with SMTP id ef9mr41748527wjd.89.1481726145517; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.24.249.83] (dyn32-131.checkpoint.com. [194.29.32.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k11sm7839416wmf.24.2016.12.14.06.35.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:35:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <5EF6F271-1CF7-4981-8E83-C7A7B49DB8F2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_25604093-B7EB-46B6-B71B-32B756D66348"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions (fwd) Jo-Philipp Wich: [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:35:42 +0200
In-Reply-To: <25431.1481725548@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
References: <25431.1481725548@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1ECzVvZsw4gdDtoVIwj3Ir6nGls>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:40:52 -0000
Hi, Michael So what do you suggest we do? I think something like the following will not have the same problem: IETF discussion list on behalf of Michael Richardson <ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>> But that just saves us from data leakage. It doesn’t get the right value into the address book. Yoav > On 14 Dec 2016, at 16:25, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > > It is unfortunate that the IETF hasn't shown more leadership here. > Auto-learning address books are going to have a problem with From lines that > say: > > First Last Name Via LISTNAME <listaddress@example.com> > > since this will hijack "First Last" to point to the list, which is going to > cause all manner of email leaks. Maybe we can do better there. > > > From: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io> > Subject: [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions > Date: 13 December 2016 at 22:50:32 GMT+2 > To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> > > > Hi list, > > a recent mailing list post from a DMARC enabled domain caused a large > flood of bounces from various mail providers, causing an automatic > disabling of about 190 subscriptions [1]. > > I re-enabled those subscriptions manually so there is no need for > further action on your side. > > In order to mitigate this problem in the future, I configured this list > to wrap mails from DMARC enabled domains into an outer mail using the > mailing list itself as sender [2]. > > Please excuse the inconvenience caused by this issue. > > > Regards, > Jo > > 1: > http://thehackernews.com/2014/04/yahoos-new-dmarc-policy-destroys-every.html > 2: > https://wiki.list.org/DOC/Mailman%202.1%20List%20Administrators%20Manual#line-544 > > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev > > > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ > ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ >
- DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC rel… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Yoav Nir
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Paul Wouters
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Paul Wouters
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… ned+ietf
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Randy Bush
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… S Moonesamy
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Yoav Nir
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Randy Bush
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Ted Lemon
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Ted Lemon
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… S Moonesamy
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John Levine
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John Levine
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John R Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John R Levine
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… S Moonesamy
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Andrew G. Malis
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Dave Crocker
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John R Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John R Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Yoav Nir
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman Hector Santos
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Dave Cridland
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Ted Lemon