RE: [Recentattendees] Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration
"fred.clark" <fred.clark@sit.gob.gt> Mon, 18 April 2016 20:16 UTC
Return-Path: <fred.clark@sit.gob.gt>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C07612E713 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nbu-Tbbn0o9e for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sit.gob.gt (mail.sit.gob.gt [200.35.162.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468AD12E712 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:15:20 -0600
Subject: RE: [Recentattendees] Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration
References: <20160418161552.9368.65562.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <000001d199af$08090370$181b0a50$@sit.gob.gt>
From: "fred.clark" <fred.clark@sit.gob.gt>
Received: from SITTELGRT (192.168.10.228 [192.168.10.228]) by sit.gob.gt; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 19:40:05 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQI7wOa3/DPbBCXeyZwtwRUcqCTbWZ672xtQ
Content-Language: es-gt
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1F66kBzMqTYiODF04yWiSe6gvUE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:16:13 -0000
Leslie, I think all the cities provide all the facilities and conforts needed for an IETF meeting. I think it may depend on the time of the year. During the period of May to September the weather will allow the attendees to walk at lunch time. I have not been at other times of the year, but my feeling is tht after September the weather gets colder and may not be as pleasant. Cordially ------------------------------------------------------- Fred L. Clark, M. Sc. Gerente de Regulación de Telefonía Superintendencia de Telecomunicaciones Correo electrónico: fred.clark@sit.gob.gt 4ª avenida 15-51 zona 10 Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala 01010 Teléfono: +502.2321.1000 Móvil: +502.5651.8133 No imprima este correo electrónico a menos que sea absolutamente necesario. Do not print this electronic mail message unless it is absolutely necesary. -----Mensaje original----- De: Recentattendees [mailto:recentattendees-bounces@ietf.org] En nombre de The IAOC Enviado el: lunes, 18 de abril de 2016 10:16 Para: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org> CC: recentattendees@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; 95all@ietf.org Asunto: [Recentattendees] Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration All, The IAOC and its meetings committee are continuing to review the situation with respect to meeting in Singapore. As I noted about a week ago [1], we are reviewing our meeting planning procedures to ensure that we have input at appropriate points to ensure issues are identified and addressed before contracts are signed and announcements made. This will mean more transparency, including sharing the list of cities under consideration when we have a workable way to handle and hear the feedback. We will make concrete progress on that at our retreat in a few weeks time. In the meantime, we do have active site discussions and negotiations ready to close for meetings that are coming up. In addition to reaching out to groups or agencies that have specific knowledge about travel for diverse groups including religious, ethnical and LGBTQ people, we are reaching out to the IETF community as a whole with this note. In order to make sure we haven’t overlooked something else that should have been properly considered for sites under consideration, as well as to gather some running code on how a feedback process might work, we would like to hear from anyone who is aware of reasons we could not have a successful meeting in any of the following cities, or of any limits to attendee accessibility or inclusiveness that should be considered: Paris Montreal Copenhagen Please send your input to venue-selection@ietf.org. It will help the review process if the Subject line had the name of the city first, Subject: <city>. In order not miss the contract opportunities, city-specific input would be most helpful if received by the end of May 2, 2016. Other input on the process will be best received in e-mail at venue-selection@ietf.org with the Subject line: Process. As we iterate the process we will continue to seek input to fashion a meeting planning process that works. Leslie, for the IAOC. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hKwBYOwPkE6VTA4mxxf00NTLLF0 -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Leslie Daigle Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises LLC ldaigle@thinkingcat.com ------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Recentattendees mailing list Recentattendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recentattendees
- Interim step on meetings site feedback — for site… The IAOC
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback â fo… Dan Harkins
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Melinda Shore
- RE: Interim step on meetings site feedback — fo… Andrew Allen
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Dan Harkins
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… John Levine
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… nalini.elkins
- RE: [Recentattendees] Interim step on meetings si… fred.clark
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feed… Corinne Cath
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feed… Ted Lemon
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… nalini.elkins
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Christian O'Flaherty
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Ted Lemon
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Melinda Shore
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Vinayak Hegde
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Ted Lemon
- f2f and mailing list participation - a question f… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Christian O'Flaherty
- Re: f2f and mailing list participation - a questi… Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback — fo… Jari Arkko
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… thomas nadeau
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… John Levine
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feed… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Melinda Shore
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Stephan Wenger
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Adam Roach
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Ted Lemon
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Adam Roach
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Yoav Nir
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Ross Finlayson
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… lloyd.wood
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… S Moonesamy
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Corinne Cath