Re: Just so I'm clear
Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Thu, 25 October 2012 18:41 UTC
Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1303521F87E1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.169, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RqC+3IetHOL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4B221F87BD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 18376 invoked by uid 399); 25 Oct 2012 18:40:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.102?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@12.207.105.210) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 25 Oct 2012 18:40:46 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 12.207.105.210
X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us
Message-ID: <508987B9.2040207@dougbarton.us>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:40:57 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Just so I'm clear
References: <20121023192135.203AC18C0A4@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <5086EF82.9060900@dougbarton.us> <20121023200713.GC1861@nsn.com> <5086FBCE.2070503@dougbarton.us> <20121023213251.GF27557@verdi> <50873AB4.1000905@dougbarton.us> <20121024034736.GC52558@crankycanuck.ca> <50876D39.20502@dougbarton.us> <508773E7.10203@cisco.com> <50877633.1000402@dougbarton.us> <EA9BEA2E-EE96-4E80-B719-652BBD620A79@lilacglade.org> <508842C2.4020203@dougbarton.us> <5088EE5A.4090103@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5088EE5A.4090103@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:41:04 -0000
On 10/25/2012 12:46 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 24/10/2012 20:34, Doug Barton wrote: > ... >> ... Nothing in the text suggests an >> unfettered right of creating new definitions of "vacant." > > You mean, new compared to the first definition in Merriam-Webster.com? > > 1: not occupied by an incumbent, possessor, or officer <a vacant office> <vacant thrones> C'mon Brian, not helpful. We're talking about the BCP 101 "definition of vacant" which unfortunately is not nearly so precise. If there were no mention of 3777 in the text then there would appear to be more leeway in declaring a position vacant. > Objectively and factually, that seems to be the case. I get that this is what you believe to be true, however what some of us are saying is that we don't agree. Given that the only choices are "vacant, or recall;" and given that the vacant state of the seat isn't 100% clear, at this time recall is the only option. Doug
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Barry Leiba
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Barry Leiba
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Eggert, Lars
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Alessandro Vesely
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Yoav Nir
- RE: IAOC Request for community feedback Adrian Farrel
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Rumbidzayi Gadhula
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Pelletier Ray
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Noel Chiappa
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Rumbidzayi Gadhula
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Jari Arkko
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Stephen Farrell
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback John Leslie
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Bob Hinden
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Michael StJohns
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Noel Chiappa
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback SM
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Michael StJohns
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Doug Barton
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Tobias Gondrom
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Noel Chiappa
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Doug Barton
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback David Kessens
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Doug Barton
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Paul Hoffman
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Michael StJohns
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Bob Hinden
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback joel jaeggli
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback joel jaeggli
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback SM
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Doug Barton
- Just so I'm clear (was: IAOC Request for communit… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Just so I'm clear Doug Barton
- Re: Just so I'm clear Eliot Lear
- Re: Just so I'm clear Doug Barton
- Re: Just so I'm clear Melinda Shore
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback edj.etc
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback David Morris
- Re: Just so I'm clear Margaret Wasserman
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Bob Hinden
- Just so I'm clear (was: IAOC Request for communit… Andrew Sullivan
- RE: IAOC Request for community feedback Tony Hain
- Re: Just so I'm clear Doug Barton
- Re: Just so I'm clear Martin Rex
- Re: Just so I'm clear Mark Andrews
- Re: rules for the sake of rules, was Just so I'm … John Levine
- Re: Just so I'm clear Yoav Nir
- Re: Just so I'm clear Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Tina TSOU
- RE: Just so I'm clear Tony Hain
- Re: Just so I'm clear Doug Barton
- Re: Just so I'm clear Michael StJohns
- Re: Just so I'm clear Melinda Shore
- Re: Just so I'm clear Michael StJohns
- Re: Just so I'm clear Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Just so I'm clear Doug Barton
- Re: Just so I'm clear David Morris
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Olaf Kolkman
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Dale R. Worley
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Turchanyi Geza
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Bob Hinden
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Bob Hinden
- Re: IAOC Request for community feedback Doug Barton