Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users

John Kristoff <jtk@depaul.edu> Tue, 15 March 2016 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jtk@iorc.depaul.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBAB12D6BD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aem2XY1H0MVe for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gb1.iorc.depaul.edu (gb1.iorc.depaul.edu [140.192.218.149]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A949212D6BB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gb1.iorc.depaul.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BE0D71D54; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:15:30 +0000
From: John Kristoff <jtk@depaul.edu>
To: Theodore V Faber <theodore.v.faber@aero.org>
Subject: Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users
Message-ID: <20160315191530.GB23345@iorc.depaul.edu>
References: <m2a8m0y72q.wl%randy@psg.com> <20160315002604.15726.qmail@ary.lan> <CACRMD1Gp_3xjanC+YXLrwo9FMcDay1JQ6YPtAS1tTqk+C_AUVg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1603150755160.47203@ary.lan> <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B845754B682@newserver.arneill-py.local> <84804F38-6F04-4EFE-A735-81EB5AE0B35C@mnt.se> <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B845754B70B@newserver.arneill-py.local> <80CF9C52-D43F-43AD-97CA-35FDB5451E66@fb.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1603151410480.48302@ary.lan> <DM2PR09MB033635D3BD6D535B8DC8944DB9890@DM2PR09MB0336.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR09MB033635D3BD6D535B8DC8944DB9890@DM2PR09MB0336.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1Ivup4_ulYHxwDdgFAEXT7r4gJA>
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jtk@iorc.depaul.edu
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:15:37 -0000

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 06:42:45PM +0000, Theodore V Faber wrote:
> On 3/15/16 11:12, John R Levine wrote:
> > About 90% of SMTP is spam.  SMTP from Tor nodes is so close to 100%
> > that I don't know anyone who accepts mail from them.
> 
> Um, 90% by weight or by volume?

How many Tor exit nodes will deliver TCP destination port 25 traffic?
Almost none from what I can tell from the current database.  Port 25 is
disabled by default in Tor installations.

John