IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 19 July 2014 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1141A0AB5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.762
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.762 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yHrngrRoB-u8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F5021A0AB4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 81284 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2014 18:09:34 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 19 Jul 2014 18:09:34 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=b9d6.53cab45e.k1407; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=McsYSUimKRcswtRcEN4joo9cpqbMA3sryZXBFFDOOLY=; b=EG/L78pZ9KTLDnBIsUQynfTpzTeY/PRVrvCcu90iwxYLvRk5LxqLOWGEnayQmmc0joUMQg5+Q9mYu7oFxNfLvZHzGd7heJ4GD0qpMg7nKgLvoPQ3WOcr4yVdvLqdXNY21YNCBm9Y13Exmp/Swq+jIwuXc6z3vfWNjczc/v5NOZyWl0+i6egvPA9OodngdVHpAk/Qxm6pemZnex5vdnf+jquQxbG+EkhyVjvEfj15VZ7qIr5TxgZxYVCCnbWxTBJ9
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=b9d6.53cab45e.k1407; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=McsYSUimKRcswtRcEN4joo9cpqbMA3sryZXBFFDOOLY=; b=JCVciyZmXTOKoBveEOVr8K4Hojipg4kTkT2c5imlchBDsdvFZ3o7ePgKUGAc4riKC3e4+P8Oil5rrE2FBNYSN+SXcqqbExXp9XgpOWKYTlqUp3FUWGknon3JCabONzcBOKZ1rLPmg7PcqEOmxhcqQz7CJWh4YhVKXja0n1gtUAukzoKsljvI3B+pQb2qOniTI+AixW4mMpWkw2ueKXPOMtOErNld8ntd8rs3QeAv2NfPGhRI7XdeDxSFTlV+LYTR
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 18:09:10 -0000
Message-ID: <20140719180910.47573.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407190348580.32743@freeman.4gh.net>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1IxurawApazlt767-Bh5Mh2F4VM
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 18:09:36 -0000

>It is this "collateral damage" from the broken aspects of DMARC that
>is disturbing.  The proponents of DMARC need to look at "the current
>details of the DMARC specification" and better understand the damage
>that they have imposed on the rest of the Internet.

What leads you to imagine that they don't understand it?

The question is how much they care, and how much we can persuade them
to help mitigate it.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email