Re: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic) to Informational RFC
Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Thu, 10 March 2016 14:10 UTC
Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C7D12D9B8; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:10:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qti.qualcomm.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5IMGhzBFeuhG; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:10:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA1E712D87A; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:03:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1457618584; x=1489154584; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=ZmHxCB5jtoI68RAd6Bde3CsJ8YH9sP7ye1+zUGhe8O8=; b=qS2VnIbVAiGm1B17wN62KYq9O9wCQ/9LbMAoF8WRvnHI+PPG7l3MS6eA nD7eIwVm+Om+UEudCrpxsfbuvc+t0+ECvghyWUDpRAJxWN9bYrL59NTsg gPze+MprpM25EMHqCAaQqNfdQatCbQ85vYGFV8rPyB2lbHTwh0NXLCItr A=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,316,1455004800"; d="scan'208,217";a="270188844"
Received: from ironmsg02-l-new.qualcomm.com (HELO ironmsg02-L.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.109]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Mar 2016 06:02:45 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5700,7163,8099"; a="654000684"
Received: from nasanexm01f.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.32]) by ironmsg02-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 10 Mar 2016 06:02:44 -0800
Received: from [10.64.165.188] (10.80.80.8) by NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:02:42 -0800
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic) to Informational RFC
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:02:40 -0600
Message-ID: <33BB6D7E-C4E4-4FC9-AC63-7A3F2BE5D6BD@qti.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160302145612.4629.67555.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160302145612.4629.67555.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_CDEC6E65-325C-4317-AED3-4E3B622C261E_="
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5226)
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: NASANEXM01E.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.31) To NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1KRfPoe6g-aftfpw9BDNg5XUBns>
Cc: draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:10:09 -0000
Pet peeve. Please make the following changes: OLD Obsoletes: 3084, 3159, 3317, 3318, 3571 NEW END (No need to obsolete; they'll show "HISTORIC" on the page. This document isn't updating the old ones.) OLD This memo reclassifies RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning, and RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, to Historic status. This memo obsoletes RFC 3084, RFC 3159, RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571. NEW This memo requests the reclassification of RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning, RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, RFC3317, Differentiated Services Quality of Service Policy Information Base, RFC3318, Framework Policy Information Base, and RFC3571, Framework Policy Information Base for Usage, Feedback, to Historic status. END OLD The purpose of this document is to reclassify the COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR) [RFC3084] and the Structure of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI) [RFC3159] along with the Differentiated Services Quality of Service Policy Information Base [RFC3317], the Framework Policy Information Base [RFC3318], and the Framework Policy Information Base for Usage Feedback [RFC3571] to Historic status. NEW The purpose of this document is to request and explain the reclassification of the COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR) [RFC3084] and the Structure of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI) [RFC3159] along with the Differentiated Services Quality of Service Policy Information Base [RFC3317], the Framework Policy Information Base [RFC3318], and the Framework Policy Information Base for Usage Feedback [RFC3571] to Historic status. END OLD It is therefore appropriate to reclassify COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic status, as described in [RFC2026]. Along with this action, the QoS provisioning data models written in the SPPI language and published in [RFC3317], [RFC3318], and [RFC3571] are reclassified to Historic status as well. NEW It is therefore appropriate to reclassify COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic status, as described in [RFC2026]. Along with this action, the QoS provisioning data models written in the SPPI language and published in [RFC3317], [RFC3318], and [RFC3571] are requested to be reclassified to Historic status as well. END pr On 2 Mar 2016, at 8:56, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to > consider > the following document: > - 'Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic' > <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03.txt> as Informational RFC > > To follow the procedure 2 at > http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html, > we need an IETF Last Call for this draft. Note that > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/ > had already its 2 weeks IETF Last Call > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-03-30. Exceptionally, comments may > be > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This memo reclassifies RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy > Provisioning, > and RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, to > Historic status. This memo obsoletes RFC 3084, RFC 3159, RFC 3317, > RFC 3318, and RFC 3571. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. -- Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
- Re: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-histo… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- RE: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-histo… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-histo… thomas nadeau
- Re: Last Call: <draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-histo… Pete Resnick