Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Mon, 09 February 2015 23:01 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047411A8A62 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:01:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.14
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.14 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22FvM89dA7Mt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:01:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDC201A8A52 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:01:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netb ([89.204.138.106]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6P5z-1XO1FF2ccV-00yRCS; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:01:19 +0100
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:01:18 +0100
Message-ID: <oseida9cqd4allijqa65fl6edq4dp6ejlr@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <54D903C0.6050209@gmail.com> <54D91478.4060303@nostrum.com> <54D9398C.8000805@qti.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <54D9398C.8000805@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Elhb0HN5Jvh06Mcp7IPTl2bIUNFnajbsxqqZf1vMmxkc3FWa86j IlFFGQwFxgxbd3NZtexHMy4TpArXC2X2sO6icTAA8Umr2bF97Vd1xwAZuYaBvYUXxH51nnD /S2gdlQ4ML3AN+wciC2pRmbj9jQ5g6e1cnFC6u2U4liqCnSwUqX0f/oAGL3c26gdwvZJp9s zDF0Dav0jX9T+YuFr2rEg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1P8lyaiILubnm65QGWibddex8nY>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 23:01:25 -0000

* Pete Resnick wrote:
>Are there particular notifications that you *don't* want copied to the 
>WG? Or maybe more to the point, are there notifications that you *do* 
>want copied to the WG?

For instance, it would be nice not to get redundant notifications like

  I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc7238bis-03.txt

immediately followed by

  New Version Notification - draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc7238bis-03.txt

on WG mailing lists.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
 Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015)  · http://www.websitedev.de/