IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Respecting the IETF rough consensus process

"Adrian Farrel" <afarrel@juniper.net> Thu, 07 November 2013 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <afarrel@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B972A21E8092 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:26:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FmsspheWaOzf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E8A21E8169 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rA7LQ6ff026950; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:26:06 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (dhcp-a32f.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.163.47]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rA7LQ316026926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:26:05 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <afarrel@juniper.net>
To: mrex@sap.com, dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <527A5EF8.2020705@dcrocker.net> <20131107205104.BB0F91AA69@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
In-Reply-To: <20131107205104.BB0F91AA69@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
Subject: RE: Respecting the IETF rough consensus process
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:26:03 -0000
Message-ID: <07c301cedbff$f86e1370$e94a3a50$@juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQI5fB/8dRfqtBZVKUeSh+ziYZcwuJlFBvWQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 08:48:31 -0800
Cc: 'IETF Discussion' <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: afarrel@juniper.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:26:19 -0000

Martin,

> > During the discussion about development of an anti-harassment policy
> 
> There are serious problems with letting american do policies,
> because they have a strong tendency to go wrong, sometime very wrong.

This is either trolling or unacceptable or both.
Using someone's nationality as a metric by which you will predict the quality of
their work is not appropriate behaviour.
Please stop.

If what you want to say is "this is important, please get it right" then that is
fine.

Moving on.

Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email