Re: I-D submission tool draft

% 
% Bill says:
%         actually, i think that the WG chairs are the -wrong- people
%         to ensure that the right text is part of each -00 IDs. you
%         really want proper legal review of each -00 id to ensure that
%         the copyright text is correct/intact.
% 
% I do not recall saying anything about the WG chairs doing this

	Hum....  this follows from the last para of your email, excerpted
	below, where you intimate that an idea for "making" this work is
	to require WG chairs to pre-approve the submission of -00 WG IDs.

I will say that I'm not fond of the idea of requiring that WG chairs
pre-approve the submission of -00 WG IDs, as a WG chair I'd rather be
able to enforce me getting a chance to review the document first - I'm
fine with letting a WG chair be able to pre approve but I do not think
it should be the only way that the process should be able to work

Scott

_______________________________________________

% 
% the reason the WG chairs are in the loop today (and tomorrow) is to
% ensure that the WG thinks the document should be a WG document, it
% has nothing to do with WG chairs checking boilerplate

	yes, nessasary but not sufficent.  Most WG chairs are not
	licensed legal advisors.

% 
% Scott
% 

-- 
--bill

Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf