Re: [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18

Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk> Fri, 17 February 2017 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <nite@hq.sk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D0B129735; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 04:52:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hq.sk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aru9aJgDQjMF; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 04:52:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hq.sk (hq.sk [81.89.59.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B85D31299D6; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 04:52:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.137.2.13] (chello085216197060.chello.sk [85.216.197.60]) by mail.hq.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F2D1240529; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:52:26 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hq.sk; s=mail; t=1487335946; bh=nYHBf/DxSJJFBIwUat3UILzGdypD2N0/k62t6go4k2A=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=S35AkkIQQcrPYgG0w4dpbERrQDLrQ8NUfYSr0Gsnjcim5Fe+wrYcU90ss05LM/AZP z8PResfVGifIhSREV20/42ZEMQE8ThuRpxyw4S7U0bezNnK9cZxFNDEHhOJPFGQDeR ibcyiTgYJz3wyocHQ3PAGsZ0InIXcHzWwEYYZw0I=
Subject: Re: [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <148730267819.21972.5284047079762312692.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8CA71836@blreml501-mbb> <eacd0409-ad8c-58d4-5270-8c147ba3ae84@joelhalpern.com>
From: Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk>
Message-ID: <d6cf2dbd-98d2-345e-521c-b8847fc894da@hq.sk>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:52:23 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <eacd0409-ad8c-58d4-5270-8c147ba3ae84@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k4sN8c2s0J89slX2dnBP0b64aqXCrHxfj"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1R7x5xp7b5khfUNbkIOyiMfQtqQ>
Cc: "draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce.all@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 12:52:29 -0000

On 02/17/2017 05:42 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> So it is intentional that this draft prohibits that behavior (PCE driven
> establishment)?

Yes, it is intentional. pce-stateful-pce is designed so that the PCC
remains the ultimate master of state, in line with RFC5440.

Regards,
Robert