Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Fri, 14 April 2017 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADAD129421 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iw898j8qrrwb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFF171294B5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id u2so67833621wmu.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G8dPXeK2vH55hWQbtJQPnZOzZu7HyHa4fKt5C1ZRp+4=; b=lq/XFJJgYziOsbxYQInwhmZ0EyO9a4yaK1rds42p++cU480tvUls7SqYxZyhWnIH1J sCZJSE5Oa6DyFolvN4m0Acustt66RyY1ii2afhuAi1SGaQxkk6kqPKi2qh5aYYLh9tSj dulqhMop+0DPEI5uxwaDznbWnbSj250ALfFXMR7WNmXqWZR4kzbvZigMY8/JXMmYZlgk tTPDQnQFe+MFrorEzyW9TRN5fJtSr/iAVhMUh1YtSB1L3uGvWkVL3EoZUJLQYkf3ROhl lDV5KxUHS7S+mmBYmBSCiPX4v1chClhJ6vLFvAsF0KvacbgUah/SD9frjlE9Cb8C9yMR lQnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G8dPXeK2vH55hWQbtJQPnZOzZu7HyHa4fKt5C1ZRp+4=; b=h4c14kztxu71X4d1/+gCpdohVzg4uUSY3O9h1dQDtHHquVJoNhZ65nAqlSb4cs4uQF VDqWVfyAdzKHNmxx9o+ytFQkdLk1rvY6hfmEq+vFhoSvTqxFS1sU9e8zy/H8XTIr/wWe d6LFUPHxJXn6pK0E0/PzR1UWsMMB7pU8m7/81dTNvrtbW+de7H8qTggHufBm4VyuzVBx l3h6au8SeLsamY6aQn78tR32ANOKjQjFr3xau109joZMsEmaR2pSp12Sbk4DN+LJm8r8 XjM1xEus4iDaSpL3pmKrWq1ZJKsOZ7w1t8NPBIjPFC94c0FuujqljSx5wJlO9bjfg697 +q7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4kqTdJUeCung2dJd8fIlmFkYcq+FA44wLrWgR2/U071i+4QBZk gVIv9SjhohHZRV+cCBs=
X-Received: by 10.28.74.70 with SMTP id x67mr8070326wma.137.1492187889364; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k199sm3256123wmd.20.2017.04.14.09.38.08 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost> <20170404211526.GA25253@gsp.org> <003F08E0-D80E-40F7-AB15-6588B7B140CF@tzi.org> <20170410180555.GA20454@gsp.org> <AF3B5F0A-EEA7-402D-B61E-EDE6CE2AE16C@tzi.org> <8546635c-f838-e7f7-a5ec-3a855a14c0f9@dcrocker.net> <20170411232408.GE48535@verdi> <15694.1491965723@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <f1481391-b477-0596-d8ea-adc02ec48e94@pi.nu> <10890.1492007455@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <04c5e6a6-fe92-20ca-f01e-5c2d17dc6022@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:38:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <10890.1492007455@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1TKNviWyHY5HHZ2ATReBIBPWj_o>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:38:12 -0000


On 12/04/2017 15:30, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Right, so this is why it's better for everyone to be remote.

Except that the IETF funding model requires attendees to pay their 
meeting fee.

- Stewart