RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter br oken- onus should be on WG to fix it)]

"Gray, Eric" <Eric.Gray@marconi.com> Fri, 16 September 2005 18:49 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EGLH2-00058Z-Va; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:49:24 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EGLH0-00055w-Ok for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:49:22 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA03753 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:49:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com ([169.144.68.6]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGLM4-0006Gu-KP for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:54:36 -0400
Received: from mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.12]) by mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8GInDB6009948; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:49:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com (uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.221]) by mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA06526; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:49:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <R3MH2QJN>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:49:12 -0300
Message-ID: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0C885E7F@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com>
From: "Gray, Eric" <Eric.Gray@marconi.com>
To: 'Spencer Dawkins' <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:49:09 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter br oken- onus should be on WG to fix it)]
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Spencer,

	I will make three observations regarding your question. It
may be that this will help the confusion, one way or the other.

1) I will not be suckered into a search for "prior art" on this.  I
   am not certain it exists, but I am certain that its existence is
   not necessarily relevant. :-)

2) Ultimately, civilized people recognize assignment authorities as
   the mechanism by which values can become property.  Any time you
   have property, you may have either litigation, or murder, when a
   question of ownership arises.

3) Sometimes, the likelihood of an event is unmeasurable and possibly 
   irrelevant in the face of the fact that the possibility certainly 
   exists.

--
EG

--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org 
--> [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
--> Spencer Dawkins
--> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 12:39 PM
--> To: ietf@ietf.org
--> Subject: Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] 
--> ISMS charter
--> broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)]
--> 
--> 
--> > Generally, the existence of an assignment authority does encourage
--> > its (proper) use - mostly for the reason you state above. Just as 
--> > "nobody will want to accept an official registration polluted by 
--> > prior use", "nobody" (deliberately in quotes) will want 
--> to attempt 
--> > to establish an unofficial registration using the approach you've
--> > described.  Doing so is - at the very least - going to adversely
--> > affect popularity and is very likely to result in interference and
--> > potentially even litigation.
--> 
--> "litigation"?
--> 
--> Do we have prior art that this is a likely result?
--> 
--> Spencer, honestly confused (for once)...
--> 
--> _______________________________________________
--> Ietf mailing list
--> Ietf@ietf.org
--> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf