Re: Minor philosophical update to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 05 July 2017 17:29 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F79C131D8A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=DIjK9i1J; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=AXteJXqV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XTBhDhz_buHb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D577C131D4F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20587 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2017 17:29:39 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=5068.595d2203.k1707; bh=606xQ5tP06oN79BLFB8ZDvUd5VlwLhNEup7GmXquliM=; b=DIjK9i1J4MEZvOF0RdKpuSkt08pZ9Sp5gR2u3krcE1vaV4dlybFJiANJXg9vq6tnUzPvE86zrRaXm+zCoG9pYAfw+aeiZwaB53b1SZe9y0Dog2mqWE0Dkj/nNJfdctmTX+VBlq91XIaQShOWk+/HK7lKa5mItkp3bE2sWddQbEjdoi7giJ96DFpviwXe1F/5MjCzdffXahm46C8EtSb3+ykj3QdYgxjzfWKUgTEIAxj4k/kizptgj4SJDfq401+O
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=5068.595d2203.k1707; bh=606xQ5tP06oN79BLFB8ZDvUd5VlwLhNEup7GmXquliM=; b=AXteJXqVJnkfj/2nP4CGUQFeOwAkCG0pn2INf6g2VkcZDW+6erIMyADZtZH5eZNmld2xSjAvkncvq5fQq3qgKY7cAXC+tIG3G+UEhsQU6P5xUZTxuFXQNKuIkOrTUhuPGwa4JeqTxZYBEoKjNpyh6wvMNgZEFtdCweve6PTElz1Q0xLf4bfY4BL1b8WCFAb4xecS8o/M+WMJ353wEwMcnG86LzSYmTmvQWvgEyBFctbeEl1/3KikX1+UZ5TWPEtg
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 05 Jul 2017 17:29:39 -0000
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:29:39 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707051328530.86608@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Minor philosophical update to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
In-Reply-To: <965D02EE-48D0-45CF-80EE-70A97C5C330D@fugue.com>
References: <20170704170910.66459.qmail@ary.lan> <965D02EE-48D0-45CF-80EE-70A97C5C330D@fugue.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1275218499-1499275779=:86608"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1YXVPcVBxmY_bP9Kfcvhgf8HQio>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:29:44 -0000
> I don't mean to open a discussion into that topic here—I realize that there is no consensus on it, and that this position is not shared by various people, yourself included. I just want to point out that you've expressed it as universally true that people think special-use names are bad, and that is not in fact the case: if it were, we wouldn't need to publish this document. I didn't say they're bad, I said they're a problem which is not the same thing. It really isn't helpful to rephrase other people's statements and get them wrong, particularly when everyone can just read the original. Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
- Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-… Warren Kumari
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Ralph Droms
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor philosophical update to draft-ietf-dnso… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… william manning
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Paul Vixie
- new DNS classes Jim Reid
- Re: new DNS classes Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes David Conrad
- Re: new DNS classes John C Klensin
- Re: new DNS classes Paul Vixie
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes or anything else John Levine
- Re: new DNS classes or anything else George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… william manning
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: new DNS classes Randy Bush
- Re: new DNS classes or anything else Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: new DNS classes or anything else John C Klensin
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… John C Klensin
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor philosophical update to draft-ietf-dnso… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor philosophical update to draft-ietf-dnso… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: new DNS classes John Levine
- Re: Minor philosophical update to draft-ietf-dnso… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: new DNS classes John C Klensin
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Randy Bush
- Re: new DNS classes shogunx
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… John C Klensin
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Martin Rex
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… John C Klensin
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes David Cake
- Re: new DNS classes Paul Vixie
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes David Conrad
- Re: new DNS classes william manning
- Re: new DNS classes Pete Resnick
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: new DNS classes Pete Resnick
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Pete Resnick
- Re: new DNS classes Randy Bush
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Andrew Sullivan
- Re: new DNS classes John Levine
- Re: new DNS classes Phillip Hallam-Baker