Re: Poll: Restructuring questions

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 24 September 2004 19:51 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA09677; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAwDJ-0001Lq-Bn; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:58:41 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAvyv-0006XG-0U; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:43:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAvrw-0003T8-QN for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:36:36 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA08678 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:36:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ns.jck.com ([209.187.148.211] helo=bs.jck.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAvyz-00014c-Mn for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:43:54 -0400
Received: from [209.187.148.215] (helo=scan.jck.com) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CAvru-000Jay-RD; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:36:34 -0400
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:36:34 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Message-ID: <7173092EB3297F05FB31B357@scan.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <89A0E4FF9BF9A11A96AB0627@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
References: <89A0E4FF9BF9A11A96AB0627@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.n o>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: fb6060cb60c0cea16e3f7219e40a0a81
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Poll: Restructuring questions
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 6cca30437e2d04f45110f2ff8dc1b1d5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Harald,

When I try to invoke this URL, I get a very impressive display
that says

	"Python 2.3.4: /usr/bin/python
	Fri Sep 24 21:32:36 2004
	
	A problem occurred in a Python script. Here is the
	sequence of function calls leading up to the error, in
	the order they occurred."

followed by a fairly impressive traceback and then

	IndentationError: expected an indented block (line 108)
	      args = ('expected an indented block', (None, 108,
	8, ' if formentry:\n'))
	      filename = None
	      lineno = 108
	      msg = 'expected an indented block'
	      offset = 8
	      print_file_and_line = None
	      text = ' if formentry:\n'

It doesn't make it easy to figure out the questions, much less
supply answers :-(

     john


--On Friday, 24 September, 2004 17:20 +0200 Harald Tveit
Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> The discussion on IETF restructuring has had a few strong
> voices, some different opinions, and a lot of listeners.
> 
> My talks with people have convinced me that many of those who
> have said nothing are indeed following the debate - some of
> them have opinions on what to do, some think that others are
> better positioned to decide than they are, and some thinkm
> other things.
> 
> So we are trying another mechanism to get your input.
> There's a poll up at
> <http://tools.ietf.org/poll/admin_scenario_alternatives/> that
> gives you a chance to say that you're listening - and IF you
> have an opinion on the current alternative scenarios, to state
> it.
> 
> If you do not speak up (by either choosing or by telling us
> different) then the IESG/IAB have no idea how to read that
> silence. So please do respond, and if you do not have an
> opinion or have not yet had the time/energy to evaluate,
> please at least show us that you saw this poll request, by
> answering the first question.
> 
> So please - take a look, and tell us that you're listening.
> 
> <http://tools.ietf.org/poll/admin_scenario_alternatives/>
> 
> Thank you!
> 
>                    Harald, for the IESG and IAB
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf





_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf