IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 23 October 2021 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B768A3A0B18 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 09:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fMYXPoDolrUr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 09:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-f50.google.com (mail-ua1-f50.google.com [209.85.222.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 200803A0B06 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 09:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-f50.google.com with SMTP id e10so13695523uab.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 09:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/XlshYEniaaXH/kTf572XyrICsyMuUsjkc4jeqrtaqw=; b=lSTAQ2HtEVcucxDyjFsB09vJDYPmqNVO24SrrhnWIEOrpqTdTdl2EScTViNftPPyPM BVS71wvttN0tsNFsUKGsGEVwnt8P9MNdkrBTn9JWimI4QYjUhksIn0iLWkHYhdv97z1b XEg0vBR+CtNOkLtI/xHrTMQHScnTMrWbJvtB2nEvDlYOLGv0S1Gan03K4UFM6VTqx/Qn 92DG2n2yBUMvhMuBx4/KwypiHqNsv+7iKgXq6626fIFekAXBf0uN8mPc55SY49tuq/w+ fWECuMVG02Gl3MkhcE/ou3RB38QuhilSW2NwImJyZmN5DTprqr/VBM9h4Sodue/kzuaA +dIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530nc61RJ+4pfIat765YJtymSu0Z9D3Udy+Tnjw0/6Nrimlrjtdi xIlIyEvp2vQKsn41D616CgHJ0efdXPIlIPfHnIs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzhVrFJpemuhL8mQOqbQyS9ctxl9FmG3CgNfFCk9cLTnE5kiDfGeT9SwMw2HeVY7pMHq2FX6oz2Q6Te6GUxPw=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:22d0:: with SMTP id z16mr7090461uam.143.1635008259004; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 09:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <394BBA1E-FA83-4E80-A143-BE3F0764DCDA@tzi.org> <F2D8B2B0-1005-424F-9984-3AC6F951E02F@eggert.org> <CDD17BF9-BBF6-413F-80A6-2928995807C1@akamai.com> <4506E7DA9EF80C64C6AE9432@PSB> <C3ECF081-E47E-4E2B-B17F-F5D39111B114@akamai.com> <7102767AA0D5C9F679E9B61C@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <7102767AA0D5C9F679E9B61C@PSB>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 12:57:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJFAKQ=Pj+t3jF0jQO63G4rpWu+9Yt4gK=qRd_SYPZt7g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007b9f8905cf0806a5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1delflF4jYc5L2ltQf_-4F0rlp0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 16:57:43 -0000

John says:
> However, IMO, if we don't like giving guidance to the
> Nomcom and then letting them exercise discretion, we should
> probably be looking at how we select our leadership more
> generally rather than imposing more rules on the current
> process.

Yes, exactly: strong agreement here.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email