IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 30 May 2014 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E241A6FE6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 12:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3cpTupREi5bv for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 12:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [209.135.209.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8801A01CB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 12:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B469A41B9; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:35:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BItO1QpUWXRd; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:34:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-96-255-144-77.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.144.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111389A41B5; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:34:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <C9EE38FB-73CE-465D-A3E2-B26D714178C1@virtualized.org>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:34:44 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3AC35945-5D30-4FB2-97E7-151BEC971CB2@vigilsec.com>
References: <20140520204238.21772.64347.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140521194638.06eaf508@resistor.net> <1111FB79-012A-414B-B8CD-0BBDAE8BD6A8@hopcount.ca> <6.2.5.6.2.20140522095317.0c5fd648@elandnews.com> <5C02BCCA-79D7-40A5-BFB0-26284A667E78@vpnc.org> <DC9ED318-2352-4AF0-8A43-29D237C32B64@vigilsec.com> <924045CD-DC34-423B-8702-CD99CF687D46@vpnc.org> <31344.1401304682@sandelman.ca> <BF0C8B7B-27D0-40B8-8FBD-5D255951222F@ericsson.com> <538795FB.6060205@gmail.com> <5387A307.4000903@gmail.com> <70E8B2EF-FD92-4DEF-BA98-0604041B0C30@isi.edu> <5388AA1B.1050803@gmail.com> <46AF19CF-C4F9-4D8A-94CC-4B3BF5FD67BD@virtualized.org> <580E7AB4-10B6-44C5-AF6E-A3A87E082BCE@frobbit.se> <C9EE38FB-73CE-465D-A3E2-B26D714178C1@virtualized.org>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1grwh2bOwH3Bn0oo9P6HBHd3-O0
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 19:35:34 -0000

> I also find it odd this is coming out of the IAB. Why this isn't a DNSOP document? It is sort of related to DNS Operations, no?

The IAB is involved because of the liaison relationship wth RSSAC.  The split in responsibility between IETF and RSSAC is the biggest change happening in this document.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email