Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)

tytso@mit.edu Fri, 20 November 2009 01:28 UTC

Return-Path: <tytso@thunk.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD62A3A6983 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:28:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.654
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.654 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id szZykKIWwchK for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thunker.thunk.org (THUNK.ORG [69.25.196.29]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073AE3A67F3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root (helo=closure.thunk.org) by thunker.thunk.org with local-esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1NBIIp-00059N-Uk; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:28:48 -0500
Received: from tytso by closure.thunk.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <tytso@thunk.org>) id 1NBIIn-0001Hf-I7; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:28:45 -0500
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:28:45 -0500
From: tytso@mit.edu
To: Michael Montemurro <montemurro.michael@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
Message-ID: <20091120012845.GA4921@thunk.org>
References: <26140d940911191638y3ffdb6a4i3a199a5d1a14b6d@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <26140d940911191638y3ffdb6a4i3a199a5d1a14b6d@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:28:52 -0000

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:38:26PM -0500, Michael Montemurro wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I understand the community’s concerns regarding the timeliness of the
> disclosure.  As I’m sure everyone can understand, as employees of
> companies we are bound by confidentiality obligations and, in
> addition, cannot always control our company’s internal processes.  The
> community’s concerns have been brought to the attention of my employer
> and they are in the process of evaluating the concerns.  My company
> has asked for your patience while they take the time to evaluate the
> concerns and determine if there is an appropriate course of action in
> this matter to alleviate the concerns of the community.

This is true, but as participants in the IETF, you can (and are
expected to) refuse to bring forward specifications for
standardization that blatently violate IETF's rules and processes....

						- Ted