Re: Enabling DMARC workaround code for all IETF/IRTF mailing lists

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Fri, 11 May 2018 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B63A126E01 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2018 11:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cqf-XwPAzdoX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2018 11:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x231.google.com (mail-ot0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EA7A126C2F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2018 11:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x231.google.com with SMTP id t1-v6so7182957ott.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2018 11:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SE0zGOhAGZvub3BijocvXfWJ8Ja4h/4+P7gqxsYswck=; b=t4sBDO5kiViiE9Yc+t0ZmE3jYkNjU0xH0mo7wc0ImmlDAtUpDvEjY+J43tHwo3sMRF w5ookXubieVwfcjrRVozgWGT2HM1ToFCXiNNupm/+ZcbBjz2cTa0X/MaKLOlATFkhmDf 7wfCLmH2Nvhf3BgaGtr/gos3gz8ZwXJst6H21JmgiFrLaQ24/r9c1O5l2mLjmQAyaj+b DIYI7TAMosq80N8RzGZY5R8sRrSaa5JRSkj+S8KGXG50Ew4lLchxRSZpV++FgHJJ9f8G 1WT9+1kp2d2dixfkJ+CKELIhQPDVH5ndkWHBhBBIp1VtZJZEk4xqNVz1M4qBJRujgWC5 jK2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SE0zGOhAGZvub3BijocvXfWJ8Ja4h/4+P7gqxsYswck=; b=KxQOmfoU8zCPomp0SUSRifNN5d83wsvAM6mesvw8gXFcWdLmijSFZTaIiAl3xOI0i5 O2C1VxmNC97AZJQD1yODs84lYi5hcroc7irB3WomGvihMRze8bRtpvRytN1ntY5gaWQ/ MMWUxzea/+8XRLjouF3ZJQPE5ok2L0D5py5zqGDufR2Y1h8cdFza0bCQTiGOHogvjhPH 9GM8Rb9bX+i9lWXbEKCFunIV6I3M3h53NDmtQF3X7zxCHszUFVOhOT7/j4Kocnr/Ghmc 5uyF6ArbG9NsUqgdceENMTGNwV968+olD+BsngDbK9nZggeaOR3saEh6yHLyJJ5wasky ImvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwe94YNeJyp3V+gKi6w0ng8RtYVsfcTS0OSwFQ6OmMzx6mDZjViA GNc2Kei4PRN1V9PTTVcmNiQqOoQ0NWbidEphJjo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpNk9mRR1KZgol1Z+MyKYpIJ6vWIwXXm/UtHQNp4fHLT5vC+ScCZPMMpxKS8IReYFfqu/LUvdiYuZqmbkIJEHA=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:719a:: with SMTP id o26-v6mr4959411otj.44.1526061807606; Fri, 11 May 2018 11:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:1f27:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2018 11:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <364ED01F-E443-4F7E-B8DD-C8F751FBE049@fugue.com>
References: <919855CA-9F77-420A-8B8F-79174CD2FC19@fastmail.fm> <61B1EDB45FC4FF33154B13B0@PSB> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B053743DE8B@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <7B87E6354F6C0A3BC7FF93B1@PSB> <364ED01F-E443-4F7E-B8DD-C8F751FBE049@fugue.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 14:03:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2zzP1L8H3DcO_ESEgXhKWEjDDGzDXsjVdd0UJrS-L6wg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Enabling DMARC workaround code for all IETF/IRTF mailing lists
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f29ef6056bf1f3a0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1k-6DuKRof8blzXYeEofQg04QSU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 18:03:30 -0000

This is getting a bit off-topic, but that said, my son is at the upper
range of what we might think of as “Kids These Days”, and is a college
professor, so he interacts with the actual Kids on a daily basis. He’s
reported to me in conversation that at least anecdotally in his experience,
the death of email is being greatly exaggerated.

Cheers,
Andy


On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> TL;DR is really just the elevator pitch for why you should read the whole
> message.   It's a conversational grace.   I think the reason Kids These
> Days don't use email is as you say, that the design is wrong for an
> internet in which we can't trust other participants to be considerate.   A
> properly designed email system would almost certainly get substantial
> uptake from the younger generation, but what we have at present competes
> poorly with federated social solutions.
>
>