Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-06
Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 20 September 2019 22:45 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70ABE120808; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 15:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn.all@ietf.org, acme@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-06
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.102.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Message-ID: <156901954237.5133.10619701231448265955@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 15:45:42 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1uRMymVWW2p6Q5yWnXdOkTLj5hA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 22:45:43 -0000
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-06 Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review Date: 2019-09-20 IETF LC End Date: 2019-09-25 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document specifies a new "challenges" for Automated Certificate Management Environment Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: The 3rd paragraph of the Introduction stated that this New Challenges requires negotiating a new application layer protocol, but no existing software implements this protocol. Therefore the ability to fulfill this challenges is effectively "opt-in". I find the statement is quite confusing. Does it mean that it is necessary to manually add processing to handle the challenge because there is no implementation of auto negotiation? Thanks, Linda Dunbar
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-tls-al… Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Alissa Cooper