Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 23 February 2016 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6486B1AC3EC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:45:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ROi6yO9gU0U9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEB1C1AC3D6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:45:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g127so145245754ywf.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:45:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=W4MkB/yD4SSjQ+rBoZ0RLylSwlSJGtlibcDLqTct2nc=; b=RfHfft7IgjO8qm4+Q5oQkpyAUDknuK5WTcWkyxbG1uPzM1gt5P9uRHKtU9RAzaUWB+ /eJFiqBNtIwK95grJc9sHgHCiaayIdrF5SeJrirOcFhtV5qc+yKBTqxJsQLdMuuxTmHW z5KigDP8X2Ccb5JJOZbU1QXwiFMg0hCYRcAjn8uIh7c95rQyThaJAE6zohNqiEkS3UyP zPDgbfJBcpcMprz38P26td6YmM2m8E6abroSpW/tOhYquxwOJa1pHY3REQAZInG/SqMv OADBd1aBKQMNhHDUn9hjeWWbweZhHq9aX8a+JEEzSIRDB+By1qAf2Pukg8U1+mMklSD3 UVow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=W4MkB/yD4SSjQ+rBoZ0RLylSwlSJGtlibcDLqTct2nc=; b=BRhdELTrQTcH+zogBNC04qqrOYmZvCE1q57LoZ6LBnKi9djt0pMO/sWeBpvA/HqUP9 aPHeZPUddXc8QPfxjSu8Awpl8RZURJqFSfX9svFLtZsKKXtBqjMk1Q/TM1QMe4Tw7rQ+ fUxrtSYHXsXd4WHGq6ZxK9vWb5QasU1M/VxF+QbF3tv7EIn9Pv83x7FIoZ7c1qznltht GHqCcAGb3f5SOsfSj5lmQ8+c7i/oqCfl3x6q/NOIw63GcxYiKvIETZA6IgW8/IADSEvh VFFceLW3A7hntEHo3mTb9y6Jjx3qgAo3VMpKLGzZfZL0EoDf/EQ3ylIPA2bq+dDmNaeH S5Rg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTkmxtRjGcyE2EAwFfFjPOhqSjF9XVsy609LP5LQikB2FdttbPanwqSE+RkE/ffZLCXK8JTdTLDFbX+8C+8
X-Received: by 10.129.96.213 with SMTP id u204mr16176361ywb.307.1456231537148; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:45:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.19.65 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:45:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56CC3BA3.2050303@si6networks.com>
References: <20160201142413.30288.23248.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr11tEDEPXkUWj4g_-wL=AgYRu7LYrOkgobEMtwOW4CpEA@mail.gmail.com> <003001d1687a$926ab2e0$b74018a0$@huitema.net> <56C3161F.3070301@innovationslab.net> <CAKD1Yr15EYQdS3XR4zenqmpBn2K2Zue2a+mMz1m+Vw54ou7zZQ@mail.gmail.com> <56CB891E.6060902@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr3MdjMrMMW+Mv2n_Ls+94Ry23e8Y_LCXhH1t4nF9Rjm4w@mail.gmail.com> <56CBA305.1050400@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr3fA4+vdfUbxxxVvbpy8JRHC8TuKqXHHv6F9HBj2rL=fA@mail.gmail.com> <56CC3BA3.2050303@si6networks.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:45:17 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1aZcd2ySq2mWoCcZxRpfL5i58VOAMKZpABMhsiQTSTZA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114926e87bf462052c6f53ae
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2259i4z6bK6ySrsOmnIrhkW1NiE>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile@ietf.org, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:45:40 -0000

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
wrote:

> > I still don't see why this document needs to formally "updates: RFC
> > 4862" if it doesn't affect any text in it.
>
> RFC4861/RFC4862 say that when M=1 you do SLAAC. Here you are saying that
> if you have a PIO with A=1, you should not do DHCPv6. That's an update
> to the existing specs.
>

Cite RFC4861/4862 text or your statement is unsupported and unactionable.