Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Tue, 17 September 2013 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7F311E8448 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.287, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qG1IbfJGpeBR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A363711E83F0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0DC1C0907; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (c213-89-137-101.bredband.comhem.se [213.89.137.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC0A11C06E7; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5238517F.8060705@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:56:31 -0400
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>
Subject: Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
References: <20130916203141.86927.qmail@joyce.lan> <C65F64A8-2D7B-47AF-BAAC-DE4DE57586B7@checkpoint.com> <523791FB.2070807@gmail.com> <CABiXOEm+D4oE7NePHmR5gviOJURqkSAhDhGb=s1o1ayJZAc7kQ@mail.gmail.com> <523845F5.9050902@gmail.com> <CABiXOEmhe5p8jMW2W=9qnhUZ_ORhwKCgA1_-dxK_NtGNy7g1zA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABiXOEmhe5p8jMW2W=9qnhUZ_ORhwKCgA1_-dxK_NtGNy7g1zA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 12:57:16 -0000

Heather Flanagan can be most easily reached at
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, the specified email address for reaching the 
rfc-editor.
Note however that you need to be clear as to what you are asking her. 
If you are asking that she arrange for the tools to include provision 
for using ORCHIDs, that is a reasonable request.  SUch a request would 
presumably be prioritized along with the other tooling improvement that 
are under consideration.

On the other hand, if youa re asking that the IETF endorse or encourage 
such uses, there are two problems.  First, the RFC Editor does not speak 
for the IETF.  You need to actually get a determination of IETF rough 
consensus on the ietf email list.  That consensus would need to be based 
on a more specific question than "do we want to allow ORCHIDs", and then 
would be judged on that question by the IETF chair.

Yours,
Joel M. Halpern

On 9/17/13 8:26 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On 17 September 2013 13:07, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure much needs to be done other than talking with Heather
>> Flanagan (the RFC Editor), getting her sign-off, and then getting
>> it into the xml2rfc schema and noting its existence.
>
> Thank you. Is Heather on this list?
>
>> I hope that what's going on here is *not* that there's been
>> little uptake and you're trying to promote its use.
>
> On the contrary; the uptake from both individuals, and organisations
> incorporating ORCID into their publishing workflows - is impressive,
> as you can see form reading the ORCID website & blog.
>