Re: Don't shoot the messenger... AOL is publishing DMARC p=reject as of today.

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 22 April 2014 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E711A0283 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.943
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.943 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OUF5K5b0vPuZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409AA1A0278 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 38684 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2014 22:04:25 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 22 Apr 2014 22:04:25 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=125d9.5356e768.k1404; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=zFWkx1Y7bcDkA8V3QMZG2gx+jpJT1jVswVcSyIM3KWo=; b=FKb7pgqu5pLapGfcpAHXTJFj9O4BIYAdQF317Yg+D4pFAA5Ss8lLAdJLeO7a7kttaIasbpps4a62AErry+DMNcXY3IjhdQe/ZmDs+m0e8gPlpQB0q96zzfVb9rqhFQhhP/7jEW6ZObP7RMLpz6gFW7Px8BsCKK0aa8zsPnxDFpCOLHEu6feRj2oAtjbvVp0RREgHT+4in3NlPvVTxWcTFBcYOzwXRh0k8l1t1QgAVK1ZQR/sg9ByiRogXNmF+xyv
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=125d9.5356e768.k1404; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=zFWkx1Y7bcDkA8V3QMZG2gx+jpJT1jVswVcSyIM3KWo=; b=WaQvmqTsaAagvwB8sJs9hU+JeqfIMmKG3uKheKh1j9zXTyx3bzT3RfVYZLwAk19HSMyKRq8wnTboY9eU1+0lZ/tXRa7v/ASwGv1XTm4B3Ea5AeukYR1Vz9l/AeqEVduE1qQKrh7Ur9QT0X9Pj61h1JCeqDAljI1dBBQocFiQNvCsbBpmfVv7e81I9BbfrbIaprhWT5yzbmRB7BILmJnyxNqrOfdHf/sfvhAoAUYWDbLaEbd9i4ZMnbkeE0F2JpLw
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:04:02 -0000
Message-ID: <20140422220402.75224.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Don't shoot the messenger... AOL is publishing DMARC p=reject as of today.
In-Reply-To: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0507D521D3@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/29hy-iXy2j5egAAJHT7ggNXZkyc
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:04:36 -0000

>As I had indicated in a previous post, I expected that AOL might follow Yahoo in publishing p=reject as a means of mitigating a
>specific type of abuse they were experiencing.
>
>http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/

This certainly confirms the theory that the members of the DMARC
cartel believe that they have sufficient market power to force
everyone else to bear the costs of the collateral damage of their
poorly targeted anti-abuse efforts.  Who knows, they might even be
right.  

In AOL's case, I presume it's because it's become painfully apparent
that crooks are stealing vast numbers of AOL address books and
spamming to them from the matching AOL user addresses. This is loudly
slamming the barn door after the horse left.  Too bad for all the
people whose feet were crushed as they did so.

R's,
John